154th Session of WHO Executive Board - action required by Jan 22.24
TAKE ACTION by 5 pm EST on JANUARY 22, 2024.
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
Tell the Office for Global Affairs
What you really think of the proposed Pandemic Agreement.
Contact the Office of Global Affairs
Office of Global Affairs
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Ave, SW
Washington, DC 20201
Phone: (202) 240-3290
OFFICIAL DETAILS AVAILABLE HERE
EVERYONE ON EARTH is invited to submit your written comments via email to OGA.RSVP@hhs.gov before 5pm Eastern time on Monday, January 22, 2024 with the subject line:
“Written Comment Re: Implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Commitments/Regimes and Other Proposed Commitments in the WHO Pandemic Agreement”
The most recent Negotiating Text of the WHO Pandemic Agreement (Negotiating Text) can be found here:
Copy and edit James’ letter to customize for yourself
These negotiations are in regards to what is essentially a trade dispute masquerading as a health issue that is beyond the competency of the World Health Organization.
Question: If I missed the deadline, can I still submit an email after the deadline has passed?
Answer: Yes. Here is what the Office for Global Affairs said: “Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.”
We're undergoing a soft coup...
Under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda.
Dr. Meryl Nass explains how the WHO's proposed pandemic treaty will enable the WHO "to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems [and] ecosystems are all central to health". 02:48 mins video https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1742156175653683338
Without criminal investigation of the accused, objective proof of harm, and lawful enforcement capability, what can be the outcome of these talks other than endless wash, rinse, repeat?
Without prejudice and without recourse
Our Greater Destiny Blog