Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BRK7_2's avatar

The BS needle is solidly in the red zone on this one : “While the current, needle-based COVID-19 vaccines have prevented a tremendous amount of death and hospitalization, they haven’t really changed a lot of people’s experience with getting recurrent infections,” . “So, we’re looking to change that by providing robust protection directly at the site of infection.” Could anyone pack more flagrantly contradictory and revealing hogwash into two sentences? To maintain the ‘safe and effective’ brand at all cost ? At least it recognizes the dumb ideology of intramuscular injections with the intent of augmenting the immune system (JJC). The logic question must be: what did this Fiona Smaill receive a PhD for?

Expand full comment
mari's avatar

Nope nope

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts