BREAKING: Alberta, Saskatchewan, B.C. Just Made a HUGE WEXIT Announcement! Part S1

There are hurdles.

Disclaimer

I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.

I surround, protect, purify and make harmless the following in-formation.\

Reference: Quebec secession

In the 1980s and 1990s, the province of Quebec pushed for separation from Canada, citing cultural and linguistic differences from the rest of the country. In response to this push, the federal government of Canada took steps to address the issue of Quebec separatism. Perhaps the most notable was the passage of the Clarity Act in 2000, which established the federal government’s right to determine whether or not a referendum question on separation was clear and provided a necessary majority for the province to leave Canada. This legislation effectively discouraged separatists from pursuing their aims, as it emphasized that the decision would ultimately rest with the entire country and not just one province.

Bill C-20 The Clarity Act

Bill C-20, the bill known as the Clarity Act gives effect to the requirement for clarity set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Québec Secession Reference.

Constitutional amendments

• 3 (1) It is recognized that there is no right under the Constitution of Canada to effect the secession of a province from Canada unilaterally and that, therefore, an amendment to the Constitution of Canada would be required for any province to secede from Canada, which in turn would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada.

• Marginal note: Limitation

  (2) No Minister of the Crown shall propose a constitutional amendment to effect the secession of a province from Canada unless the Government of Canada has addressed, in its negotiations, the terms of secession that are relevant in the circumstances, including the division of assets and liabilities, any changes to the borders of the province, the rights, interests and territorial claims of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada, and the protection of minority rights.

Last update 2025-07-24 https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-31.8/page-1.html

Alberta’s Exit From Canada BEGINS – Historic Separation Underway!

July 06, 2025

Alberta has officially triggered the process that could lead to its separation from Canada. With a referendum petition now filed, and 120 days to gather over 177,000 signatures, Alberta’s independence movement has taken a dramatic leap forward. 07:53 mins

Western Provinces Just Made a HUGE WEXIT Announcement!!!

July 06, 2025

This video breaks down the stunning joint statement released by Western leaders, revealing what’s behind this renewed push: out-of-touch climate mandates, resource seizures, carbon tax hikes, and a Prime Minister seen as ignoring the West. We’ll cover Premier Danielle Smith’s bold moves, Saskatchewan’s resistance, Manitoba’s quiet alignment — and the rising unrest in British Columbia. You’ll also hear how Indigenous leaders and rural communities are fueling this movement from the ground up. 09:37 mins

B.C. Just OFFICIALLY Made a HUGE Deal That Puts Canada on Edge!

July 23, 2025

Saskatchewan and Alberta Drop a 51st and 52nd State BOMBSHELL That SHOCKS Canada!

July 26, 2025

Saskatchewan and Alberta Drop a 51st and 52nd State BOMBSHELL That SHOCKS Canada! 13:17 mins

Canada Act 1982 Decolonization / Patriation w/out Quebec

The Canadian government has had an obligation to hold a nationwide constitutional referendum for its citizens, predating the Canada Act 1982 request by Parliament and the Senate to the United Kingdom, which only partially patriated the Constitution on April 17, 1982.

Amendment to the Constitution Act, 1867

Commencement

58 Subject to section 59, this Act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the Queen or the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada. End note⁽¹⁰⁹⁾

109: The Act, with the exception of paragraph 23(1)(a) in respect of Quebec, came into force on April 17, 1982 by proclamation issued by the Queen (see SI/82-97).

Marginal note: Commencement of paragraph 23(1)(a) in respect of Quebec

• 59 (1) Paragraph 23(1)(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the Queen or the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada.

• Marginal note: Authorization of Quebec

  (2) A proclamation under subsection (1) shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec. End note⁽¹¹⁰⁾

  
  110: No proclamation has been issued under section 59.

• Marginal note: Repeal of this section

  (3) This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this Act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section, by proclamation issued by the Queen or the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada.

Date modified: 2025-07-24 https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-13.html

Canadian citizens still within the realm of British control

Thanks to Nicole Lebrasseur for the following:

Page 60 #131 UK role before 1931:

Nicole: The UK stance is such that they do not have to listen to the provinces b/c a problem between the provinces and Canada itself is not a problem between the provinces and the UK government. The provinces are not sovereign. They do not have any rights to the King on their own. It all has to come down from the federal government.

Page 61 # 134 UK role in circumstances of federal provincial disagreement

In such circumstances, it would be in accord with the role accepted by the UK authorities 1931 for those authorities to satisfy themselves what the request conveyed, to clearly express the wishes of the Canadian people as a whole. Since that role was assumed at the specific invitation of Canada as a federally structured whole, such an exercise of it would neither violate Canada's sovereignty or Independence nor improperly question the authority of Canada's national government or Parliament.

Nicole: So they needed the people as a whole and that's why there's a referendum for the Canadian people that includes indigenous Nations on their side, so there would be two referendums. One for Indigenous and one for us to accept what was written in the Constitution and how we wanted to change and to implement the changes we want to see. Trudeau didn't want that to happen so the whole thing was a scam.

https://thecpu.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/1stReportFAComUKBNAV1_1981Jan21.pdf

The Canadian Constitution is still in the UK Parliament

And Canada is still a colony of the United Kingdom.
Is secession a distraction or part of a bigger plan?

Part SII Canada and USA still governed by the UK

https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/canada-and-united-states-of-america

Part SIII [a] All wars are Black Nobility wars

https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/all-wars-are-black-nobility-wars

Part SIII [b] The Northern Black Nobility

Papal bloodline's global power structure.
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/the-northern-italian-black-nobility

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
constitution