Hello Denise and thank you. The ones who obey, once they know, have little influence w/out the majority of humans becoming aware and withdrawing consent faithfully and consistently to the beast system en masse. Withdrawal requires personal sacrifice short term for long term gain i.e. transforming this dark construct to advance a coherent new era and freedom, where debris from the past cannot follow.
I fully agree. However when are we going to get started? People are not talking about what we can do to wean off this vile system. Doreen I found something that can help us, get a load of this, it's brilliant. It is very much like the system I authored called the Egalitarian Proposal System. This one is stupendous, on the same lines but much more comprehensive. It's called Sapiocracy. This is the sort of thing we need to be testing and trying out. https://www.sapiocracy.com/sapiocracy.html
Doreen glad you looked it up. That is correct, those odds are stupid, and one of the many stupid results of the current system, we certainly don't want to be inoculating the new system with this twaddle. There is also something else wrong with Sapiocracy or that degrades it in my view, but which I came to after having had it pointed out by someone else - the idea of weighting when it comes to voting weight. This weighting system would be better left to ranking each member in a rating system, and not used for voter weight. Every person's weight should hold the same value, but that may have a caveat too as say, those closer to (say) a chemical dump would have more weight than those who are not in that vicinity. All these are areas for improvement and discussion and ultimately it is the vast majority of people who should qualify to agree on something being implemented. I'm glad you read it through with your keen eye of objectivity. And if there is anything else, please bring it up. Paul Schmidt may be open to making changes.
Hello Denise. Bottom line ... it is humans who must change, not politicians who are blackmailed, paid off and controlled by a satanic cult for millennia.
You got that right Doreen "Where is the vaccine for psychopathy and democide?"
They are so inbred that they're utterly deranged. But who is more deranged, them or the ones who obey them once they know?
Hello Denise and thank you. The ones who obey, once they know, have little influence w/out the majority of humans becoming aware and withdrawing consent faithfully and consistently to the beast system en masse. Withdrawal requires personal sacrifice short term for long term gain i.e. transforming this dark construct to advance a coherent new era and freedom, where debris from the past cannot follow.
I fully agree. However when are we going to get started? People are not talking about what we can do to wean off this vile system. Doreen I found something that can help us, get a load of this, it's brilliant. It is very much like the system I authored called the Egalitarian Proposal System. This one is stupendous, on the same lines but much more comprehensive. It's called Sapiocracy. This is the sort of thing we need to be testing and trying out. https://www.sapiocracy.com/sapiocracy.html
Hello Denise
1.3 Goals
Sapiocracy endeavors to accomplish the following to any sufficiently large group of people:
• Direct democracy
In a democracy, 51% of the majority can take away the rights of 49% the minority. That’s not freedom.
Doreen glad you looked it up. That is correct, those odds are stupid, and one of the many stupid results of the current system, we certainly don't want to be inoculating the new system with this twaddle. There is also something else wrong with Sapiocracy or that degrades it in my view, but which I came to after having had it pointed out by someone else - the idea of weighting when it comes to voting weight. This weighting system would be better left to ranking each member in a rating system, and not used for voter weight. Every person's weight should hold the same value, but that may have a caveat too as say, those closer to (say) a chemical dump would have more weight than those who are not in that vicinity. All these are areas for improvement and discussion and ultimately it is the vast majority of people who should qualify to agree on something being implemented. I'm glad you read it through with your keen eye of objectivity. And if there is anything else, please bring it up. Paul Schmidt may be open to making changes.
Hello Denise. Bottom line ... it is humans who must change, not politicians who are blackmailed, paid off and controlled by a satanic cult for millennia.
https://government-scam.com/
https://www.amazon.com/Government-Biggest-Scam-History-Exposed/dp/B0DG75QJCB