I recently developed an apparatus, and coined it Linear Causality. Why Linear? Because pure linear is not found in nature. In its own regard it is an unobstructed infinite line, and static (no moving parts, but simultaneous none the less), and holds all the information which ever was, is , and will be.
We cannot see (as the Observer Effect goes) it. WE unknowingly through our own analog visual scope, engage it. Cyclic locks on to linear by encapsulating a segment of this line. The segmented portion becomes the circles diameter (pi) ... While the remaining exterior segments become virtual, but still static themselves, and mimic each diametric movement of that newly formed diameter ... Which is now rotatable within its circle.
A sudden shift in focus collapses the circle, and at the same time reconnects both mimicking exterior lines to their diameter & newer coordinates. These new coordinates now become the arc degree minutes necessary for reassembling that previous focus from the newer coordinates to that collapse. The static infinite line regains its zero degree continuum, with newer information.
What this tells us is that we create an analog reality from visually engaging that infinite line.
Now the infinite line is reactionary to each focus by projecting a square with a diagonal axis ... While at the same time a circle encompasses this square.
This is how analog (Time & Motion) interacts with [-the static] infinite line.
The infinite line is now 2-diminsional (180 linear degrees), while its encapsulating circle engages the square. This diagonal square, as a consequence, opens to 3-D as it reacts to a three dimensional engagement from analog territory. As we see this ... The square is now a three dimensional object (cube) arising off of a two dimensional plain, [the severed] infinite line.
So the zero degree pristine non dimensional infinite line is now a diametric (hexagonal) paradox. This means that the "Hex - Cube Illusion" becomes an apparatus for creating an analog playing field [Time & Motion (henceforth, T&M)] out of what was originally pristine linear & static.
The moment you see that thoughts arise on their own — and are not authored by the observing awareness — identification collapses instantly. That part is real, and it doesn’t require years of practice.
One refinement I’d add: not all thoughts are neutral background noise. Many are conditioned, entrained, or reinforced by external systems. Seeing thoughts as “not-self” is the first liberation. Learning discernment — which ones to ignore, which ones to refuse, which ones to act on — is the second.
Awareness isn’t passive. It’s sovereign.
When identification drops, reality doesn’t respond to thinking — it responds to coherence. And coherence isn’t a belief or a frequency slogan. It’s alignment between perception, body, and action.
Thank you for clarification about discernment. I agree. So, when an unexpected thought arises I become the observer. In other words, I am training my mind by simply observing the thought w/out engagement and w/out getting emotionally triggered, which allows me to resonate balance and harmony.
The moment you observe the thought instead of merging with it, you’ve already stepped out of the loop. No argument. No suppression. No emotional charge feeding it.
The key nuance:
You’re not trying to fix the thought or push it toward harmony.
You’re letting it arise, register, and dissolve without borrowing your identity or nervous system.
That’s not detachment — that’s sovereignty.
Over time, the mind learns something very simple and very destabilizing to its old habits:
Uninvited thoughts don’t get fuel here.
And when the fuel stops, the entire architecture reorganizes on its own.
Powerfull framing here. The Lebet experiments you reference really do shift the traditional understanding of free will and conscious choice. What strikes me is how this observer perspectiv on thoughts parallels Buddhist mindfulness practices but grounds it in neuroscience rather than spiritual tradition. The 300-500 millisecond lag is facinating because it suggests we're essentialy experiencing a narative constructed after the fact. That said, even if thoughts arise unconsciously, the awareness that observs them still seems to have agency in how we respond to thos patterns.
The static state is infinite (linear) and compressed simultaneously.
Our analog state of things is the static state decompressed.
The static infinite [-line] holds emotions to the 137 prime number.
Its 731 composite (analog) number engages its inverted static prime counterpart and warps (dilates) time so a 50/50 exchange for that static emotion to release compression from 6:1 to a 1:6 pixel - to - frame by frame advance vibrational exchange. Then, as the unfolded emotion outlives its usefulness, it re-compress via a hexagonal apparatus, and is returned to its prime numbered parking spot on the infinite line, via that same inversion.
The pixel - to - frame completes the dilation, then re-calibrates back to clock time.
This apparatus is coined "Clockwork 137" and is a static - to - analog decompression and re-compression chamber for time to variate about while outside of clock time.
The apparatus itself is intense and mind shredding.
So from this we can say that time, as a go between, becomes a measure of the coordinates to where it had been affixed, relative to motion ... And nonetheless, a product of an apparatus which is solely driven by the 137 prime number.
Saturn's polar axis is this hexagonal apparatus. Her gaseous outer rings interact as an inverse diameter to her internal rotatable one.
Understandably, this may need clarification, so dial into Roberts substack at mackr.substack.com.
Then realize that her six outer orbitals [Venus & Mercury excluded due to a retrograde - to - 800 year duration locking mechanism ... which kicks the two into a vibrational subsystem of their own].
This system of seven orbitals hold a 6:1 / 1:6 ratio to Saturn and are concentric to her external diameter.
Clockwork 137 is a derivative of the Fine Structure Constant ... as neg integers cannot exist in 'ANALOG MOTION'.
I recently developed an apparatus, and coined it Linear Causality. Why Linear? Because pure linear is not found in nature. In its own regard it is an unobstructed infinite line, and static (no moving parts, but simultaneous none the less), and holds all the information which ever was, is , and will be.
We cannot see (as the Observer Effect goes) it. WE unknowingly through our own analog visual scope, engage it. Cyclic locks on to linear by encapsulating a segment of this line. The segmented portion becomes the circles diameter (pi) ... While the remaining exterior segments become virtual, but still static themselves, and mimic each diametric movement of that newly formed diameter ... Which is now rotatable within its circle.
A sudden shift in focus collapses the circle, and at the same time reconnects both mimicking exterior lines to their diameter & newer coordinates. These new coordinates now become the arc degree minutes necessary for reassembling that previous focus from the newer coordinates to that collapse. The static infinite line regains its zero degree continuum, with newer information.
What this tells us is that we create an analog reality from visually engaging that infinite line.
Now the infinite line is reactionary to each focus by projecting a square with a diagonal axis ... While at the same time a circle encompasses this square.
This is how analog (Time & Motion) interacts with [-the static] infinite line.
The infinite line is now 2-diminsional (180 linear degrees), while its encapsulating circle engages the square. This diagonal square, as a consequence, opens to 3-D as it reacts to a three dimensional engagement from analog territory. As we see this ... The square is now a three dimensional object (cube) arising off of a two dimensional plain, [the severed] infinite line.
So the zero degree pristine non dimensional infinite line is now a diametric (hexagonal) paradox. This means that the "Hex - Cube Illusion" becomes an apparatus for creating an analog playing field [Time & Motion (henceforth, T&M)] out of what was originally pristine linear & static.
This lands where it matters.
The moment you see that thoughts arise on their own — and are not authored by the observing awareness — identification collapses instantly. That part is real, and it doesn’t require years of practice.
One refinement I’d add: not all thoughts are neutral background noise. Many are conditioned, entrained, or reinforced by external systems. Seeing thoughts as “not-self” is the first liberation. Learning discernment — which ones to ignore, which ones to refuse, which ones to act on — is the second.
Awareness isn’t passive. It’s sovereign.
When identification drops, reality doesn’t respond to thinking — it responds to coherence. And coherence isn’t a belief or a frequency slogan. It’s alignment between perception, body, and action.
Still, this is a clean doorway.
Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
— RIB
Thank you for clarification about discernment. I agree. So, when an unexpected thought arises I become the observer. In other words, I am training my mind by simply observing the thought w/out engagement and w/out getting emotionally triggered, which allows me to resonate balance and harmony.
Yes — that’s the pivot point.
The moment you observe the thought instead of merging with it, you’ve already stepped out of the loop. No argument. No suppression. No emotional charge feeding it.
The key nuance:
You’re not trying to fix the thought or push it toward harmony.
You’re letting it arise, register, and dissolve without borrowing your identity or nervous system.
That’s not detachment — that’s sovereignty.
Over time, the mind learns something very simple and very destabilizing to its old habits:
Uninvited thoughts don’t get fuel here.
And when the fuel stops, the entire architecture reorganizes on its own.
—RIB
This is fantastic!!
Powerfull framing here. The Lebet experiments you reference really do shift the traditional understanding of free will and conscious choice. What strikes me is how this observer perspectiv on thoughts parallels Buddhist mindfulness practices but grounds it in neuroscience rather than spiritual tradition. The 300-500 millisecond lag is facinating because it suggests we're essentialy experiencing a narative constructed after the fact. That said, even if thoughts arise unconsciously, the awareness that observs them still seems to have agency in how we respond to thos patterns.
I'm told that reality is observation.
Observation is analog.
The static state is infinite (linear) and compressed simultaneously.
Our analog state of things is the static state decompressed.
The static infinite [-line] holds emotions to the 137 prime number.
Its 731 composite (analog) number engages its inverted static prime counterpart and warps (dilates) time so a 50/50 exchange for that static emotion to release compression from 6:1 to a 1:6 pixel - to - frame by frame advance vibrational exchange. Then, as the unfolded emotion outlives its usefulness, it re-compress via a hexagonal apparatus, and is returned to its prime numbered parking spot on the infinite line, via that same inversion.
The pixel - to - frame completes the dilation, then re-calibrates back to clock time.
This apparatus is coined "Clockwork 137" and is a static - to - analog decompression and re-compression chamber for time to variate about while outside of clock time.
The apparatus itself is intense and mind shredding.
So from this we can say that time, as a go between, becomes a measure of the coordinates to where it had been affixed, relative to motion ... And nonetheless, a product of an apparatus which is solely driven by the 137 prime number.
Saturn's polar axis is this hexagonal apparatus. Her gaseous outer rings interact as an inverse diameter to her internal rotatable one.
Understandably, this may need clarification, so dial into Roberts substack at mackr.substack.com.
Then realize that her six outer orbitals [Venus & Mercury excluded due to a retrograde - to - 800 year duration locking mechanism ... which kicks the two into a vibrational subsystem of their own].
This system of seven orbitals hold a 6:1 / 1:6 ratio to Saturn and are concentric to her external diameter.
Clockwork 137 is a derivative of the Fine Structure Constant ... as neg integers cannot exist in 'ANALOG MOTION'.