The PREP Act: Repeal is an uphill battle Part II of II

Colossal deception disclosed.

Disclaimer

I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.

Apr 24.25
Stephanie Weidle, Feds for Freedom interviews Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt.

Repeal the PREP Act

34:00 Stephanie Weidle: If repealing the PREP Act cannot happen through the courts, how can it happen?

Sasha Latypova: We're focusing on this right now with a number of colleagues. The PREP Act must be repealed however this is a difficult uphill battle, which the current administration so far has expressed no interest in even acknowledging it’s the problem. The ultimate objective is to get rid of this evil law. It's illegal. It's unconstitutional law. The public and professionals, especially health care professionals and legal professionals, anyone with interest in it, doesn't matter which side they're on including the evil side. I'm happy to talk to anyone. Our children and grandchildren are going to be subject to this ultimately, so everyone needs to be educated about the monstrous illegality of all these EUA countermeasures being pushed as safe and effective approved FDA vaccines.

Bait and switch

35:33 Sasha Latypova: Peter Marks, head of CBER [Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research] just resigned. He is the key guy who needs to be in jail, who needs to be on trial for his life, for committing mass murder because he was the one who fronted that bait-and-switch scheme. He was the one who went on record, even in court declarations and in other venues, he fronted this bait-and-switch. So EUA countermeasures are all these products and the PREP Act, and the current PREP Act declaration they can push out medicines or activities or whatever rules, masking, vaccines. They're not regulated and you can lie about them.

So, Peter Marks and his position of authority as head of CBER FDA, when a couple of his colleagues resigned because they wouldn't sign off on approval of these vaccines he took it on, this whole thing, instead. Took their jobs and played this FDA approval. Well, there was no approval. There's no legal approval applicable to this. And then he validated the fraud. He signed off on the fraud issuing these approval letters in August 2021 so that all of these things could be mandated. Under PREP Act, EUA countermeasures cannot be mandated. That's very clear. He did the bait and switch. He went on record, said these are fully FDA approved and then all the mandates.

Covid emergency is ‘not’ over - three calls to action

37:10 mins Katherine Watt: It would be useful if people looked back at the civil rights movement and Martin Luther King Jr. because his analysis was largely based on the idea that the laws themselves were illegal. And therefore, the only appropriate way to respond to them is to refuse to obey them because they are immoral.

39:05 Sasha Latypova: Another thing, so there are three.

1] Repeal of the PREP Act
2] Education about EUA countermeasures and lying about fully approved status by Peter Marks and FDA and everybody else
3] We all need to call on RFK Jr., our current HHS secretary, to terminate current PREP Act declaration for COVID emergency extended by Xavier Becerra outgoing HHS secretary to last until December 31st of 2029. Nobody knows this, which is by design.

They want everyone to think the COVID emergency is over. It's not. It's fully extended. It's fully operational. And the law, the PREP Act, says that HHS secretary it's only his opinion. Nothing else matters. He doesn't have to take into account any data, any science, nothing. So it's only his opinion that there is a current emergency of COVID. So right now, we are supposed to interpret this as it's personal RFK Jr.'s opinion that we have a COVID emergency and we need to have those EUA countermeasure biologic shots on baby's vaccination schedules. That's his opinion. Until he terminates that PREP integration, which all it takes is a memo into the Federal Register, just a memo, just him saying I don't think so anymore. Thank you.

Self defense issue

42:12 Katherine Watt: If the people in Idaho went back and tried instead to amend their criminal codes, to add vaccines to things like gun and knife in assault with a deadly weapon, criminal statutes, because it gets more at the fact that vaccines do not have a medicinal purpose, they only have a poisoning purpose and the state has an interest in letting the people know what counts as a deadly weapon by adding vaccines to that list. Because in my view, it's not a medical freedom issue. It's a self-defense issue because these are not medical products. These are weapons.

44:05 How use of the phrase ‘unavoidably unsafe products’ in relation to vaccines strengthens the PREP Act.

46:21 How the people who pushed the COVID measures committed treason.

48:55 Freedom of Information [FOIA’d] requests reveal no record of ‘oaths of office’ for high-level officials in the first Trump administration and the Biden administration. Many health and related high level officials did not have oaths office executed while they were doing this.

Treason and the law

49:36 Katherine Watt: There are several laws related to that main treason one. It is also a crime if you know of treason not to disclose it. It's a crime to incite rebellion, which you can construe what the HHS secretary has been doing as a form of rebellion or seditious conspiracy. Another one prohibits advocating the overthrow of the U.S. government constitution and laws. That's Congress … basically did overthrow the U.S. government constitution and laws by passing the PREP Act and by not repealing it. Every day that goes by they are sitting in there and they know about this, which they do, and they don't put forward bills to repeal it they're adding their own ratification of the treason.

Militarized public health

51:16 Katherine Watt: They’re not hiding anything. They merged public health with the military. That's one of the nuances. I have a slightly different perspective on what Sasha and Debbie Lerman put together with the COVID dossier, because I think that... they say COVID was not a public health event, but I think it was a public health event to the extent that public health and military are the same thing. They have been the same thing for many, many decades. The public health part of it is the chemical and biological warfare part of the U.S. military. And so, yes, they're going to keep using it. They're going to keep pretending there are threats that don't exist and they're going to say that they do. They're going to keep pretending what they've developed is a remedy in some way or a preventative for the threat that does not exist. And the remedy itself is a poison. And they're going to keep using the whole package.

Covid is a military campaign

52:23 Sasha Latypova: I recently read a very detailed account of an official U.S. government biological warfare program going on before Nixon terminated it. It went on for 27 years and the scripts … developed back then … all these approaches of fear mongering about non-existent threats and coming up with remedies and solutions, which only evolve into more power and more money to the people who are implementing these things … that was back there. They renamed everything but it's the same thing.

Covid 1.0 and Donald Trump

54:38 When the original COVID emergency declaration was issued during Trump administration March 13th or something of 2020, it was made retroactive to February 4th, 2020. What happened on February 4th, there was a phone call coming from DARPA, DOD, to the pharmaceutical consortium that had been previously established since the beginning in 2012 to manufacture these, to create this manufacturing base for vaccines, for pan-influenza vaccines, and they've been funding it all this time.

They called them on February 4th and told them that COVID has been declared a national security threat. The person placing the phone call, or at least in charge of this notification, was Colonel Matt Hepburn of DARPA. He's the mastermind of the pandemic preparedness plan, which was the plan for the DOD to identify pandemic potential viruses based on nonsense like PCR and computer modeling, and for the pharma companies to make vaccines and therapeutics within 60 days to which the person on tape, VP of monoclonal antibodies for AstraZeneca, Mark Esser said, initially, I thought it was science fiction.

On February 4th, DOD, DARPA specifically, Matt Hepburn went ahead of the president of the United States declaring this and distributing a humongous amount of money. $50 billion already went out of the door before Trump could even blink under all of this. Jennifer Santos who was head of purchasing pushed the button, Trump got enraged, fired her. She was immediately moved to the Navy, but there was a big drama about this.

They went ahead, screw Trump, we don't need his approval. They went ahead, distributed money, gave orders, declared a national security threat. Then at some point, I think Jeffrey Tucker actually at Brownstone traced this through Trump's tweets that at some point on March 10th or 11th, Tucker Carlson went to Mar-a-Lago and convinced Trump somehow, I don't know how, that he needs to go along with all of this. They brought him on board. He declared the Stafford Act Declaration and that's why they made it retroactive to February 4^th when DOD declared it, not Trump. So that's why we're saying it's a military campaign. It's driven from DOD somewhere. I don't know exactly where, probably DOD and CIA together, I would think, and DARPA and BARDA and all those other acronyms.

Tucker Carlson in Mar-a-Lago

Mar 18. 2020
Since Carlson’s visit to the Mar-a-Lago, Trump declared a national emergency over the coronavirus and requested an $850 billion stimulus package to combat the economic impact. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/355036/i-felt-i-had-a-moral-obligation-tucker-carlson-crashed-mar-a-lago-party-to-talk-with-trump-about-the-coronavirus/

Solutions

58:30 Sasha Latypova: I recommend praying and meditating, reading the Bible and stories that tell you to do the right thing regardless of the circumstances or outcome. You have to think about it and meditate on this and do the right thing every day and all the time. The right thing includes, yes, absolutely civil disobedience with this illegal monstrous attack on all of us. In addition to vaccines, refuse Real ID, refuse biosecurity measures, refuse digital money, programmable money, refuse all those 15-minute cities and all those acts they try to implement mostly through public health measures you notice, because this whole structure now hinges, I agree, it's a campaign that is using public health to install fascism. Where they try to dictate things in schools, try to dictate things to you in civil life and businesses, you should find those hallmarks of where this is all going in one direction, refuse those and refuse to comply.

Request for help

If you have time and resources to spare, help us, help us do this. A nurse, Laura Desmarais is organizing all these meetings and county commissioners. We have a whole procedure of how to go and talk to your county commissioners about them and encourage them to issue declarations. That can be done by activists, by people on the ground, by people who have some resources to contribute to this. Lawyers, please help us. That's what we can do. We can rebut this.

Video

And transcript. 1:01:07 mins
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/the-prep-act-an-act-of-treason

https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/posts
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/archive

Part I

https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/the-prep-act-an-act-of-treason-part

Vaccines don't save lives, healthy immune systems do

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
lawusa