2 Comments
User's avatar
Lynda Craig's avatar

Why does it have to be so black and white. No nuance or subtlety. Just ‘viruses don’t exist.’ The terrain theory does not exclude the existence of viruses. In fact, I am leaning towards a hybrid system, terrain and germ.

But, the main issue I have is my own personal experience. I have observed chicken pox go through the children of a family. My own children and a relatives. Chicken pox is obviously not detox. It has a pattern and sequence of symptoms that eventually resolve.

I also had measles when I was little, as did a lot of my friends. This was before the vaccine. Back then it was no big deal. And it was obviously a disease that ran its course and conferred lifelong immunity. I have experienced more regarding the spread of disease etc.

The ‘no-virus’ gang seem to work together and a lot of them also push the FE psyop.

To discredit critical thinkers who are questioning the status quo. They are also extremely dismissive, arrogant and rude when questioned. I find that suspect.

Obviously we have been lied to about viruses and contagion but somewhere in the middle lies the truth.

Expand full comment
Roxanne's avatar

The claim of 'viruses' has no basis in science. Observations of illness are not proof of the cause. No 'virus' has ever been shown to exist in reality. This is easily verified and demonstrated within the literature and methodology itself. Have you taken the time to read John Enders 'Measles isolation experiment', done any FOI requests, written to virologists and health institutions as well as learning the history and methodology of virology for yourself? You may find starting from the beginning helpful with your learning journey. I am not part of any 'gang'. I simply did a lot of reading, FOI requests and letter writing to determined the truth. I didn't care what the outcome was - virus or no virus. In fact it would have been easier to stick with the preprogrammed dogma so I didn't have to realise I poisoned my babies for no possible benefit at all. You must decide if you are looking for the truth or to defend your current belief. It seems to me you don't know because you keep listening to everyone else without ever looking at the primary source documents yourself. Please correct me if I am wrong. Best to you.

Expand full comment