Our Greater Destiny Blog

Share this post

10 Scientific 'known' flaws in the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2

www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca

10 Scientific 'known' flaws in the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2

Fact based evidence went nowhere.

Doreen
Oct 24, 2022
2
Share this post

10 Scientific 'known' flaws in the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2

www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca

*Updated Nov 24.22 *

As early as Nov 2020 it was known

At the start of the covid-19 scamdemic mainstream media and governments were relentless in penetrating the minds of man with number of ‘cases’ ‘cases’ ‘cases’. Cases of what? Cases that resulted from using excessive threshold cycles that guaranteed positive PCR test results for SARS-CoV-2; never proven to exist. See below‘No Record Found’.

Kary Mullis inventor of the PCR test began to speak openly about how RT-PCR cannot detect an infectious disease. In other words, the PCR test could not diagnose Covid-19 and can be manipulated by increasing the number of cycles of RNA amplifications. After Kary began speaking out he was found dead.

Thank you Kary Mullis, and may you rest in eternal peace. 4 mins

No Record Found

Continually udpated: 211 institutions and offices in over 35 countries have responded, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification. All responses are available at https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 [PCR test]

The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

* At Ct 35 less than 3% of cultures are positive

Ct represents cycle thresholds or # of amplifications used in the PCR tests world-wide. Ct up to 45 were used In PCR tests. There were no Ct standards established for labs nor hospitals, which allowed perpetrators to relentlessly report escalating cases to frighten unaware people into compliance with covid restrictions.  

In an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct >25 as the virus is not detected in culture above this value [6]. This limit was then evoked in the French media during an interview with a member of the French Scientific Council Covid-19 as a possible value above which patients are no longer contagious [7]. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603

Counter the assault

It’s time to double our efforts to inform others of the truth.

Please share this link widely https://vaxjustice.org especially with people experiencing adverse events and/or lost loved ones after covid injections.

The J4V Team [Justice for the Vaccinated] is ready to assist people with comments, questions, and/or injuries.

Together we are strongest.

Share Our Greater Destiny Blog

Thanks for reading Our Greater Destiny Blog! Subscribe for free to spread the closest truth. TY!

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Archive - Our Greater Destiny Blog

pcr


 

Share this post

10 Scientific 'known' flaws in the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2

www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Doreen
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing