10 Scientific 'known' flaws in the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2
Fact based evidence went nowhere.
Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
As early as Nov 2020 it was known
At the start of the covid-19 hoax, mainstream media and governments were relentless in manipulating group mind with number of ‘cases’ ‘cases’ ‘cases’. Cases of what? Cases that resulted from using excessive threshold cycles that guaranteed positive PCR test results for SARS-CoV-2 never isolated to prove it even exists.
Kary Mullis inventor of the PCR test spoke openly about how RT-PCR cannot detect an infectious disease. In other words, the PCR test could not diagnose Covid-19 and test results can be manipulated by increasing the number of cycles of RNA amplifications. After Kary began speaking out he was found dead.
Thank you Kary Mullis, and may you rest in eternal peace. 4 mins
Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 [PCR test]
The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws.
* At Ct 35 less than 3% of cultures are positive
Ct represents cycle thresholds or # of amplifications used in the PCR tests world-wide. Ct up to 45 were used In PCR tests. There were no Ct standards established for labs nor hospitals, which allowed perpetrators to relentlessly report escalating cases to frighten unaware people into compliance with covid restrictions.
In an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct >25 as the pathogen is not detected in culture above this value [6]. This limit was then evoked in the French media during an interview with a member of the French Scientific Council Covid-19 as a possible value above which patients are no longer contagious [7]. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603
Counter the assault
Spread the truth. TY!
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Archive - Our Greater Destiny Blog
pcr