TY! Lawyer Catherine Christensen represents members of all branches of Canadian military. I just inserted into my blog a video interview with her discussing the present status of Canadian military.
I'm from BC and can't imagine that spineless M'f'er David Eby ever considering seperation. He's the classic boot licking bum boy for the Libertards. I for one would be surprised if he did. Not sure about Manitoba. Saskatchewan might.
Hello Ken and thanks for your comment. I suspect David Eby follows orders like all other globalist installed politicians who dare not leave the reservation.
Thank you for answering the best you could. Its very well appreciated and I realize this will be a battle not indifferent to any other the west has had to deal with.
I'm for this but i have a question . Canada as a whole now has a debt created by the Liberal government. If the West divides do they have to cover the debt before they separate or a percentage of it ?
Oxford Law Professor John Finnis’ 2014 Coxford Lecture on "Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter." Filmed April 8, 2014 London, Ontario https://youtu.be/LiaSlgZ71oU
McNamara indicates it was he, who in the autumn of 1980, suggested the Committee take up the Patriation issue: I asked my colleagues on the Committee to examine the role of the British Parliament in relation to any changes in the constitution of Canada that it might be invited to pass not because I felt that this Parliament had a right to nit-pick about what Canada wanted or did not want for its citizens—that is a matter for Canada, and we cannot properly intervene—but because we had a right and a duty to protest when it appeared that the Canadian Government sought to rubber stamp proposals through this Parliament which they could not get through their own Parliament and provinces under their own procedures. Instead of the British Parliament intervening in Canadian internal affairs, the Canadian Government sought to use our procedures to legitimise what they could not get through in their own country. That was an abuse of their position. [page 56]
As I read it, the UK Parliament supported a Canada Supreme Court ruling that allowed the Canada Act to be patriated without Quebec. This would make the Canada Act 1982 illegal.
Canada's military was gutted through covid-19 injections.
TY! Lawyer Catherine Christensen represents members of all branches of Canadian military. I just inserted into my blog a video interview with her discussing the present status of Canadian military.
I'm from BC and can't imagine that spineless M'f'er David Eby ever considering seperation. He's the classic boot licking bum boy for the Libertards. I for one would be surprised if he did. Not sure about Manitoba. Saskatchewan might.
Hello Ken and thanks for your comment. I suspect David Eby follows orders like all other globalist installed politicians who dare not leave the reservation.
And I bet he's neck-deep in the fentalyn "business."
Canada’s role in expanding global illicit economies.
The International Coalition Against Illicit Economies [ICAIE] Policy Brief on Growing Harms of Cross-Border Illicit Trade Vectors and Threat Convergence to Canada's National Security. https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/icaie-report-colossal-scale-of-international
Thank you for answering the best you could. Its very well appreciated and I realize this will be a battle not indifferent to any other the west has had to deal with.
Wow..what a development, this is a political soap opera, the patient always dies in the end.
We are in
cathrine christianson, lawyer for the military,
we have appointed the Lt sophie amden exequatur ,agent to represent our council of 28.
will the militaruy represent the Akkies to great britain?
Hello Popois. Thank you for responding.
I could not find any information for Lt. Sophie Amden.
Will the Council of 28 rebut separation of all 4 provinces from Canada?
Are natural resources in each of the 4 provinces owned by indigenous peoples or did they relinquish rights via Treaties?
The planet is under martial rule rendering our laws silent.
One more question. Are you working with indigenous peoples in Quebec?
I will call you tomorrow.
Get it done
I'm for this but i have a question . Canada as a whole now has a debt created by the Liberal government. If the West divides do they have to cover the debt before they separate or a percentage of it ?
All I can suggest is that Canadian politicians are likely following a plan given to them by globalists, to advance one step closer to a world coup.
Their is a lot of work to do and its gonna be easy. Just my 2 cents.
However I believe it is doable.
Wow ! That is disturbing. I believe that will be one of the tactics that they use.
Possibly. And if plan A fails, they likely have plan B, C, etc. in place and ready to go.
Firstly, Canadian debt has been created by many governments, liberal and conservative. It would be impossible to “divide” it.
Makes sense. TY!
I think the natives might have something to say
thanks doreen,
since the original people are alive and well, title holders, holder in due course of the trust,
we do not consent
Hello Popois
Are you aware of the following?
Oxford Law Professor John Finnis’ 2014 Coxford Lecture on "Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter." Filmed April 8, 2014 London, Ontario https://youtu.be/LiaSlgZ71oU
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1982/feb/17/canada-bill#column_325 [column on right side]
McNamara indicates it was he, who in the autumn of 1980, suggested the Committee take up the Patriation issue: I asked my colleagues on the Committee to examine the role of the British Parliament in relation to any changes in the constitution of Canada that it might be invited to pass not because I felt that this Parliament had a right to nit-pick about what Canada wanted or did not want for its citizens—that is a matter for Canada, and we cannot properly intervene—but because we had a right and a duty to protest when it appeared that the Canadian Government sought to rubber stamp proposals through this Parliament which they could not get through their own Parliament and provinces under their own procedures. Instead of the British Parliament intervening in Canadian internal affairs, the Canadian Government sought to use our procedures to legitimise what they could not get through in their own country. That was an abuse of their position. [page 56]
As I read it, the UK Parliament supported a Canada Supreme Court ruling that allowed the Canada Act to be patriated without Quebec. This would make the Canada Act 1982 illegal.
Is this not so?