Debate regarding use of PCR for diagnosing infectious disease
Kary Mullis: Martyr or Menace?
Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
Mike Stone’s blog was too big for me to post here so I copied into a PDF below.
By Mike Stone
Jan 31.25
Disclaimer: The descriptions of what PCR is supposedly capable of in this article do not reflect my personal views on the technology. My intent is to provide an accurate representation of Kary Mullis’s perspective as the inventor of PCR. By referencing his own words, I aim to clarify how he envisioned its use and limitations, without endorsing or disputing those claims personally.
Kary Mullis … in his own words
As “Covid” hysteria spread worldwide and PCR testing became central to the so-called “pandemic,” Kary Mullis naturally emerged as a pivotal figure in the information war. His warnings against using PCR solely as a diagnostic tool resurfaced, with memes and messages challenging the mainstream narrative. Mullis’s skepticism of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis and his outspoken criticisms of Anthony Fauci—a key figure in both “crises”—became rallying cries for those questioning the official story. Many saw him as a hero who would have exposed the misuse of his invention to fuel panic over an unproven hypothesis. His sudden and suspiciously-timed death in August 2019, just months before the “pandemic,” further elevated his legacy as a rebellious voice silenced by the pharmaceutical cartel.
While many see Mullis as an unsung hero, others view him as a hidden villain designed to obscure the truth. Frustrated by the rise of Mullis as a martyr, these individuals seek to reframe him as a menace. They point to his unwavering belief in PCR, his acceptance of “viruses” and “antibodies,” his ties to the pharmaceutical industry, and his Nobel Prize win as reasons to discredit him. Critics have gone to great lengths to dismiss and smear him as a gatekeeper blocking access to the real truth, penning lengthy essays that lean on dubious connections to sow doubt and distrust. Perhaps the central argument from these individuals is that Mullis’s words have been misinterpreted, asserting that he actually supported using PCR as a sole diagnostic tool for “infectious” disease rather than opposing it, making him the monster responsible for current and future “pandemics.”
Let’s find out
In the following PDF you will find the PCR Patent filed by Kary Mullis.
The language in Kary Mullis's 1985 patent does suggest his invention could be used to detect sequences related to “pathogenic” entities in order to diagnose “infectious” diseases. This has been a cornerstone argument for those who claim that Mullis was not opposed to the use of PCR for diagnosing such diseases. However, this argument reveals a misunderstanding of the patent process and disregards Mullis’s later statements on the subject.
Source
Jan 31, 2025 https://mikestone.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-martyr-or-menace
No PCR wash, rinse, repeat
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/pcr-inventor-kary-mullis-explains
At this critical juncture
Most of what is seen and heard is subject to interpretation. Since PCR continues to be used to diagnose infectious disease in humans and animals, the full debate regarding authenticity of using PCR to diagnose pathogens belongs in the public domain with supporting evidence. Please file for future reference and share. TY!
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
pcrdebate
Mike Stones' blog was too big for me to repost here so I copied it and created a PDF.