Getting a tan
By Revealed Eye
Sept 14, 2026
Repost
Shocking study reveals that GETTING A TAN protects you from over 99% of 5G EMF* exposure! Why? Because of the structure of melanin and how it protects against electromagnetic frequencies! Dr. Admad Ammous joined us on Decentralize TV to discuss this astonishing information that very few people know about yet. (But more are learning all the time!) Full interview is at Decentralize TV.
Source https://substack.com/@revealedeye/note/c-336443328
* EMF = electromagnetic frequency
AI-generated answer
Research indicates that darker or tanned skin does not significantly block 5G electromagnetic fields (EMF); rather, the melanin content in tanned skin may actually absorb more of the radiation.
Absorption vs. Blocking: Studies show that 5G radiation (28 GHz) penetrates deeply into the epidermis, where it is absorbed by skin tissues. Melanin is identified as a material that efficiently absorbs and dissipates electromagnetic energy, acting as an “intelligent energy manager” rather than a reflective shield.
Impact on Pigmentation: Exposure to 5G EMF has been observed to attenuate (reduce) skin melanogenesis by suppressing reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggesting that the radiation interacts with melanin production processes rather than being blocked by existing pigment.
Shielding Limitations: While human skin acts as a barrier to deeper internal organs for high-frequency waves, this is due to the shallow penetration depth of the waves themselves, not the presence of melanin or tanning. Consequently, tanned skin remains a primary site for EMF absorption rather than a protective barrier.
Melanogenesis
Melanogenesis is defined as the synthesis of melanin in melanocytes, specialized cells that produce pigment granules called melanosomes, through a process regulated by the enzyme tyrosinase, resulting in brown and black pigments that contribute to the color of animal skin and hair. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/melanogenesis
Yeah, we were lied to about “vitamins”
By MrX
Sep 13, 2026
Repost
Some un-injected folks are discovering they have massive blood clots as well.
https://exhibitx.substack.com/p/yeah-we-were-lied-to-about-vitamins
Vitamins that Can Increase Blood Clot Risk
Blood clots are a serious health concern that can lead to heart attacks, strokes, and other life-threatening conditions. In this blog post, we will discuss some of the vitamins that have been linked to an increased risk of blood clots, so you can make informed decisions about your vitamin intake and overall health. https://bloodclot.org/vitamins-blood-clot/
NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare
Dennis M. Bushnell, "Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]" (sic), NASA Langley Research Center (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), July 2001, 113 pp.; PDF, 1400357 bytes, MD5: c833f3fbc55d07fe891f5f4df5fb2f57. The aforesaid PDF was found on the US Department of Defense's Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) website. Continues at https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025
To follow NASA document by page number
Vitamin references on pages 52 and 98.
https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/dtic.mil-ndia-2001testing-bushnell-3.pdf
Why Vitamin D Is Called a Steroid Hormone
By Science Insights
Nov 27, 2025
The original classification of Vitamin D as a vitamin is purely a historical accident, reflecting the state of nutritional science in the early 20th century. Rickets, a bone-deforming disease, was widespread, and researchers sought a dietary factor that could prevent it. In 1922, the substance found in cod liver oil that cured rickets was identified and named “Vitamin D,” following the sequential naming of vitamins A, B, and C.
A classic vitamin is defined as an organic compound required in the diet because the organism cannot synthesize it endogenously*. Vitamin D initially fit this definition because a dietary source was necessary to prevent rickets when sunlight exposure was insufficient. However, the body can synthesize Vitamin D3 endogenously in the skin upon exposure to UVB light, which disqualifies it from the strict, modern definition of a vitamin. The name has simply persisted despite the later discovery of its hormonal synthesis and function. Continues at https://scienceinsights.org/why-vitamin-d-is-called-a-steroid-hormone/
*Endogenously: Originating from within.
Vitamin D friend or foe?
Dr. Tom Cowan reveals scientifically that vitamin D3 is a steroid hormone, a metabolite of cholesterol, not a vitamin. https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/vitamin-d-friend-or-foe
Sunshine data
Planes discharge chemicals that block sunlight for weeks at a time. I am trying to find a chart that compares average hours of sunlight per year going back a number of years. If you find such a chart from 2010 or earlier up to 2025 where you live, please insert the link in the comment area below. Thank you.
Part I 5G Is War on Humanity; No legal limits on EMR
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/5g-is-war-on-humanity-no-legal-limits
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
5g-vitamins
Vitamin D3 is rat poison:
This one is especially easy to dissect because the underlying science is real, but the conclusion goes way beyond it.
Scam Protocol, short version
FACT → SCI-FI LEAP → MONEY
Melanin interacts with electromagnetic radiation
→ “Therefore tanning may protect your body from 5G”
→ 5G fear + alternative-health authority + audience engagement/products
1. THE FACT
There is legitimate research on melanin-inspired materials interacting with microwave frequencies. A 2025 Nature Communications study examined an engineered melanin-like material and its electromagnetic properties. That is real science.
2. THE SWITCH
The study did not show that tanning protects humans from 5G.
It studied an engineered material, not a person with a suntan. The leap is:
engineered melanin-like material → natural human melanin → tanned human skin → protection from 5G exposure.
Those are four different claims.
There is no demonstrated clinical evidence that getting a tan provides meaningful protection from 5G. Current CDC guidance treats excessive UV exposure as a cause of skin damage and skin cancer, not as a protective treatment.
3. THE DISTORTION
This is the classic “real molecule + wrong application” trick.
The legitimate question:
“What electromagnetic properties does melanin have?”
gets transformed into:
“Go get more sun because your melanin is an electromagnetic shield.”
That's not what the underlying experiment established.
4. THE MONEY / AUDIENCE HOOK
The immediate hook is fear of 5G, followed by positioning alternative-health personalities as people who understand the “hidden” protective mechanisms conventional medicine supposedly ignores.
That's a powerful attention funnel even before a product is attached.
BOTTOM LINE
The melanin research is real. The claim that tanning protects you from 5G is not established by that research.
The forensic error is simple:
REAL MATERIALS SCIENCE → FALSE HUMAN EXTRAPOLATION → HEALTH ADVICE.
Vitamin D3 is rat poison:
This one is especially easy to dissect because the underlying science is real, but the conclusion goes way beyond it.
Scam Protocol, short version
FACT → SCI-FI LEAP → MONEY
Melanin interacts with electromagnetic radiation
→ “Therefore tanning may protect your body from 5G”
→ 5G fear + alternative-health authority + audience engagement/products
1. THE FACT
There is legitimate research on melanin-inspired materials interacting with microwave frequencies. A 2025 Nature Communications study examined an engineered melanin-like material and its electromagnetic properties. That is real science.
2. THE SWITCH
The study did not show that tanning protects humans from 5G.
It studied an engineered material, not a person with a suntan. The leap is:
engineered melanin-like material → natural human melanin → tanned human skin → protection from 5G exposure.
Those are four different claims.
There is no demonstrated clinical evidence that getting a tan provides meaningful protection from 5G. Current CDC guidance treats excessive UV exposure as a cause of skin damage and skin cancer, not as a protective treatment.
3. THE DISTORTION
This is the classic “real molecule + wrong application” trick.
The legitimate question:
“What electromagnetic properties does melanin have?”
gets transformed into:
“Go get more sun because your melanin is an electromagnetic shield.”
That's not what the underlying experiment established.
4. THE MONEY / AUDIENCE HOOK
The immediate hook is fear of 5G, followed by positioning alternative-health personalities as people who understand the “hidden” protective mechanisms conventional medicine supposedly ignores.
That's a powerful attention funnel even before a product is attached.
BOTTOM LINE
The melanin research is real. The claim that tanning protects you from 5G is not established by that research.
The forensic error is simple:
REAL MATERIALS SCIENCE → FALSE HUMAN EXTRAPOLATION → HEALTH ADVICE.