Discussion about this post

User's avatar
denise ward's avatar

Some very insightful ideas there. Especially

Because in the end,

it is not the speed of learning

that defines us—

it is the depth of awareness

we are willing to reclaim.

At the end of the article it asks to join the conversation however when I try to it says I have to sign in. When I try to it says by invitation only. I don't know if there's a ransom for being part of the conversation (ie: a subscription charge) but even if there isn't, this shows he is still in the withering paradigm, the one he seems to want to transcend. What are we going to? Surely we are going towards sovereignty and away from enslavement? These things need to be defined, analyzed to bring into consciousness so we are not letting the program steer us. As sovereigns we would welcome all contributions of expression. But people "play it safe" and let their paranoia and ill thoughts get the better of them and try to vet people before they even say anything. This is old paradigm thinking.

There are many who have insights but something they fail to understand is that they only have a small portion of the puzzle or picture. When they limit the ideas they expose themselves to, they keep themselves locked into this paradigm. It reveals they do not understand what living in a new terrain is about - it's about sovereignty, it is about freeing ourselves, it is about transcending violence and supremacy, of which violence couldn't exist without the practice of supremacy. Sovereignty is what is needed now, a new mindset for a new existence and the fulfilment of everyone's potential.

No posts

Ready for more?