My response to IHR amendments and a proposed pandemic treaty

The voice of the people is the voice of our Creator.

From: alignshineprosper@earthcentral.ca <alignshineprosper@earthcentral.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 8:24 PM
To: 'oga.rsvp@hhs.gov' <oga.rsvp@hhs.gov>
Subject: “Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session on public health emergencies preparedness and response negotiations”

By, under, out of, and through the absolute authority of Necessity and Emergency and other Extraordinary Measures.

MAXIMS OF LAW

A maxim is so called because its dignity is chiefest, and its authority the most certain, and because it is universally approved by all.
Necessity overcomes the law; it breaks the chains of justice.
That which is not otherwise lawful, necessity makes lawful, and necessity makes a privilege which supersedes law.
He who affirms, not he who denies, must bear the burden of proof.
An act done without my consent is not my act.
The law never permits anything contrary to truth.
A human body is not sus­ceptible of appraisement.
To refer errors to their principals is to refute them.
Nothing is so contrary to consent as force and fear.
No man can forfeit the right of another.
No one is beyond the law.
Not what is said, but what is done, is to be regarded.
Word of mouth flies away, things written remain.
An equal has no power over an equal.
Facts are more powerful than words.
He who reaps the advantage, must also bear the disadvan­tage.
He who does not prevent what he can prevent, is considered as doing the thing.
He who does anything through another, is regarded as doing it himself.
That which is not valid at the beginning, improves not by lapse of time.
All men are equal as far as natural law is con­cerned.
Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin.
What is mine can­not be taken away without my consent.
When the interpretation between liberty and slavery is doubtful, the decision must be in favor of liberty.
We must have recourse to what is extraordinary when what is ordinary fails.
A mandate of an illegal thing is void.
Reservation and protest do not create a right, but protect a right.
Rights never die.
Suppression of the truth is equal to the expression of the false.
Evidences are to be weighed, not numbered.
Where transgres­sion is multiplied, let the infliction of punishment be increased.
Where there is no authority to enforce, there is no necessity to obey.
Truth fears nothing but concealment.
Truth, which is not sufficiently defended, is oppressed.
False in one thing, false in all things.
Man is a term of nature; person, of the civil law.
Ignorance of those things one is bound to know does not excuse.
Ignorance of the law excuses no one; for all are presumed to know those things to which all consent.
Impunity invites to greater crimes.
One may do with his own as he pleases, if he does not invade the rights of others.
Law is a rule of right, and whatever is con­trary to the rule of right, is an injury.
An oath made among others should neither harm nor profit.
Justice knows neither father nor mother; jus­tice regards truth alone.
Fictions arise from the law, and not the law from fictions.
The law works harm to no one, and does no one an injury.
The law regards the order of nature.
Liberty is more favored than all things.
The body of a freeman does not admit of a valuation.
Many things pertain not to human laws, but to divine juris­diction.
The voice of the people is the voice of God.

As a stakeholder, I present the following information to support more equitable and timely access to the closest truth, and request confirmation that the following information is shared with Member States of the World Health Organization who agreed in 2022 to embark on a process to amend the current International Health Regulations, with the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), and with U.S. delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body drafting and negotiating a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, prior to a new version due Apr 18.24, and in advance of Apr 22 to 26.24 final meetings. 

ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY

BY Dr. Denis Rancourt - excerpt

I am an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The essay is based on my May 17, 2023 testimony for the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony, and our continued research.

Testimony https://denisrancourt.ca/videos.php?id=86&name=2023_05_17_national_citizens_inquiry_ottawa_day_1_nci

Exhibits https://archive.org/details/boe-expert-witness-denis-rancourt-nci-ce-nc/mode/1up

In addition to critical reviews of published science, the main data that my collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race, living accommodations), the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiology characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause.

Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We have used it to detect and characterize seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars, population aging, long-term societal development, and societal assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many countries around the world, and over recent history, 1900-present.

Here are my conclusions from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

1. If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality,

2. There was no pandemic causing excess mortality,

3. Measures caused excess mortality,

4. COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality.

Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents. In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years and older. We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.

https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay

NATIONAL CITIZEN’S INQUIRY [NCI] CANADA

In spring 2023, the NCI held 24 days of hearings across Canada, where commissioners heard testimony from over 300 witnesses. The NCI was a citizen-led, citizen-funded effort to examine Canada’s response to COVID-19.

https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS = No Record Found

As of March 23, 2024: 222 institutions and offices in 40 countries responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” purification. 

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Institution List see attached xls.
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Institution-list-for-website.xls

CALL TO DUTY

On behalf of every man, woman and child unaware of above testimonies and data, I request the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), and U.S. delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body drafting and negotiating a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, halt further negotiations until the above information is fully examined and factored into lessons learned, before any decision and/or amendment to the IRH 2005 and proposal for a pandemic treaty proceed. Thank you.

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Ontario, Canada

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
ihr