Thank you for prompting me to clarify my statement as follows.
Throughout history when a revolution was successful, there was always another well ‘groomed’ globalist puppet ready to emerge at the just right time, to smooth talk the majority of people right back into the same low vibratory frequency prior to the revolution because the ‘result’ of forcing change in the external world to fit your picture of reality is always temporary. World conditions prove it, yet day after day the same patterns are repeated over and over … to no avail.
I think to be a little more clear, the Oligarchy is a band of PREDATORS who use COLLECTIVIST philosophies to control and exploit the non-predatory! The various bands of said predators form a pyramid a power with the top predator band controlling and manipulating the others! Individualist oppose the collectivism that the predators attempt to impose.
I got in touch with Edward G. to tell him about alternative systems we could be using but he ignored me. Just about everyone has not everyone though. You have too Doreen. It seems nobody is interested in starting a new paradigm, just interested in reinforcing how dumb they think we are and sadly they seem to be right too often.
I'm glad you asked. One of them is the Egalitarian Proposal System and it will replace politics altogether, make them obsolete.
How it works is using software much like survey software with a website that holds proposals. The proposals have a proper structure that allows change to be made promptly yet coherently. It's all done in the open, totally transparent. People submit proposals of anything they want to be done or to change. They give the reasons both sides and open up a discussion period where all sides are shared. After the discussion period, the proposer takes any new information and considerations and writes out a revised proposal. This is the one that goes to the vote.
A quorum must be met. Voting without a quorum is utterly ridiculous because what if say 10,000 people only voted in the Trump election? A good number of the voting population needs to be engaged in order to make change. Not 51% which is only 1% above randomness! Something like 70 or 80%. And the percentage for a quorum needs to be something the people decide. Even stupid proposals can be submitted because if a proposal doesn't get the interest or the vote then it goes nowhere. Only the proposals that meet the criteria get "passed" which means implemented. There is no need to pay millions of workers to have democracy and we don't have it anyway with all this expense and waste of people's time.
Things like a money system and an implementation system need to be streamlined and they can be now, with the tech at our fingertips. I have written about it here:
To improve external reality is an ‘inside job’ that begins with individuals opening their brain to new information and taking responsibility for what their choices project into physical matter reality. Itzhak Bentov states “What we call reality is not something that happens outside of us, but a vibrational projection that originates from within and manifests externally.”
I never suggested using force. I stated a fact: force is temporary. The point being using force does not work. The historic record of revolutions proves this is so.
Hello and Welcome! Everything is subject to interpretation so yes, exhibiting group loyalty, making decisions based on what is best for the group, working collaboratively can be considered collectivism.
Thank you for prompting me to clarify my statement as follows.
Throughout history when a revolution was successful, there was always another well ‘groomed’ globalist puppet ready to emerge at the just right time, to smooth talk the majority of people right back into the same low vibratory frequency prior to the revolution because the ‘result’ of forcing change in the external world to fit your picture of reality is always temporary. World conditions prove it, yet day after day the same patterns are repeated over and over … to no avail.
Hi, btw, re: G. Edward Griffin's: 'Who Are They':
I came across this yesterday, & have not read yet:
"They Want To Usher In A New World Order." Yes, But Who Are 'They'?
https://www.booksbehindborders.org/p/new-world-order-elite-families?triedRedirect=true
Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters on 9/11, JFK, Gaza,
and Why the Israel Lobby Is Trying to Destroy Him
The Tucker Carlson Show
https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-roger-waters-071726
JuL17'26
'There’s never been a legitimate criminal investigation into 9-11,
the deadliest terror attack in US history.
Roger Waters is trying to change that.'
------------
WhoDid911?
I think to be a little more clear, the Oligarchy is a band of PREDATORS who use COLLECTIVIST philosophies to control and exploit the non-predatory! The various bands of said predators form a pyramid a power with the top predator band controlling and manipulating the others! Individualist oppose the collectivism that the predators attempt to impose.
BTW: Collectivism, I think, means literally to collect people, a goal of predators.
I got in touch with Edward G. to tell him about alternative systems we could be using but he ignored me. Just about everyone has not everyone though. You have too Doreen. It seems nobody is interested in starting a new paradigm, just interested in reinforcing how dumb they think we are and sadly they seem to be right too often.
Give me a hint of your favored alternative systems!
I'm glad you asked. One of them is the Egalitarian Proposal System and it will replace politics altogether, make them obsolete.
How it works is using software much like survey software with a website that holds proposals. The proposals have a proper structure that allows change to be made promptly yet coherently. It's all done in the open, totally transparent. People submit proposals of anything they want to be done or to change. They give the reasons both sides and open up a discussion period where all sides are shared. After the discussion period, the proposer takes any new information and considerations and writes out a revised proposal. This is the one that goes to the vote.
A quorum must be met. Voting without a quorum is utterly ridiculous because what if say 10,000 people only voted in the Trump election? A good number of the voting population needs to be engaged in order to make change. Not 51% which is only 1% above randomness! Something like 70 or 80%. And the percentage for a quorum needs to be something the people decide. Even stupid proposals can be submitted because if a proposal doesn't get the interest or the vote then it goes nowhere. Only the proposals that meet the criteria get "passed" which means implemented. There is no need to pay millions of workers to have democracy and we don't have it anyway with all this expense and waste of people's time.
Things like a money system and an implementation system need to be streamlined and they can be now, with the tech at our fingertips. I have written about it here:
https://deniseward.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-proposal-system
If you spend the time to read it, I'd appreciate any of your comments both good and bad.
To improve external reality is an ‘inside job’ that begins with individuals opening their brain to new information and taking responsibility for what their choices project into physical matter reality. Itzhak Bentov states “What we call reality is not something that happens outside of us, but a vibrational projection that originates from within and manifests externally.”
https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Challenges%20to%20Creating%20an%20Egalitarian%20Society_0.pdf
The result of using force in the external world is always temporary. If revolutions worked, we would be discussing another one?
I never suggested using force. I stated a fact: force is temporary. The point being using force does not work. The historic record of revolutions proves this is so.
Hello and Welcome! Everything is subject to interpretation so yes, exhibiting group loyalty, making decisions based on what is best for the group, working collaboratively can be considered collectivism.
Is Revolution/Accountability still possible?:
G.E.Griffin: Yes Yes Yes!
but we're running out of time
'We're'
-----
Focus Unite!
;-)