Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
Are 1984 and 2024 twin years?
By Lawyer Lisa
Aug 12.24
Canada is just legislating prison for speech. Life in prison. That's all.
Whereas speech is our actual and only weapon.
Everywhere, tyrants are getting out of their lanes and making the moves.
And that means you get up. You go straight to where the cameras are being put up in your town and you demand they take them down. You think reprieves will last forever?
These weaponized cities must be challenged. Make it so all fronts are our fronts. Make it so they are doing the dancing.
In New Zealand vaccine by cop is written up.
In Australia the cops get your private messages like in perpetuity.
Continue at https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/australia-goes-full-tilt-1984
Australia’s Digital ID Act 2024 signed into law
Promoted as the new Digital ID system that will better protect the privacy and security of Australians. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d47c423f-eef6-495a-90a5-5123c2232600
Flash point
Australians will be required to submit ID to access internet and police must have access to their social media including private messaging all tied to their social credit score. https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1822808738262315049
New Zealand new pandemic plan
July 2024
The New Zealand Pandemic Plan sets out the health system strategy and framework for actions for preparing for and responding to future pandemics. It can be adopted and applied (with adaptations as necessary) to any pandemic event. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/new-zealand-pandemic-plan-framework-action
Will New Zealand’s pandemic plan bring martial law, forced vaccination?
By Ethan Huff August 12, 2024
New Zealand is leading the way with a new pandemic plan that allows the minister of health to utilize "special powers" in the event of an emergency.
According to the plan, the minister of health will have the power to "detain, isolate, or quarantine persons, places, buildings, ships, vehicles, aircraft and animals" in the event of a public health scare. https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/new-zealands-new-pandemic-plan-will
The Origins of Totalitarianism
By Hannah Arendt
Circa 1951
“The Origins of Totalitarianism” discusses the rise of totalitarian movements of Nazism and Stalinism in the 20th century. Arendt explained that such movements depended on the unconditional loyalty of the masses of “slumbering majorities,” who felt dissatisfied and abandoned by a system they perceived to be “fraudulent” and corrupt. These masses sprang to the support of a leader who made them feel they had a place in the world by belonging to a movement.
Published more than 50 years ago, Arendt’s insights into the development of totalitarianism seem especially relevant to discussions of similar threats to American democracy today.
Why ‘Origins’ matters now
Many of the factors that Arendt associated with the rise of totalitarianism have been cited to explain Trump’s ascendancy to power.
In “Origins,” for example, some key conditions that Arendt connected with the emergence of totalitarianism were increasing xenophobia, racism and anti-Semitism, and hostility toward elites and mainstream political parties. Along with these, she cited an intensified alienation of the “masses” from government coupled with the willingness of alarming numbers of people to abandon facts or to “escape from reality into fiction.” Additionally, she noted an exponential increase in the number of refugees and stateless peoples, whose rights nation-states were unable to guarantee.
Why people’s voices and actions matter
Arendt rejected a “cause and effect” view of history. She argued that what happened in Germany [Holocaust] was not inevitable; it could have been avoided. Perhaps most controversially, Arendt claimed the creation of the death camps was not the predictable outcome of “eternal anti-Semitism” but an unprecedented “event that should never have been allowed to happen.”
The Holocaust resulted neither from a confluence of circumstances beyond human control nor from history’s inexorable march. It happened because ordinary people failed to stop it.
Arendt wrote against the idea that the rise of Nazism was the predictable outcome of economic downturn following Germany’s defeat in World War I. She understood totalitarianism to be the “crystallization” of elements of anti-Semitism, racism and conquest present in European thought as early as the 18th century. She argued that the disintegration of the nation-state system following World War I had exacerbated these conditions.
In other words, Arendt argued these “elements” were brought into an explosive relationship through the actions of leaders of the Nazi movement combined with active support of followers and inactions of many others.
Not submitting quietly
I argue that “Origins” engages readers in thinking about the past with an eye toward an uncharted future.
“Origins” wasn’t intended to be a formulaic blueprint for how totalitarian rulers emerge or what actions they take. It was a plea for attentive, thoughtful civil disobedience to emerging authoritarian rule.
What makes “Origins” so salient today is Arendt’s recognition that comprehending totalitarianism’s possible recurrence means neither denying the burden events have placed on us, nor submitting quietly to the order of the day. Continue at https://theconversation.com/the-power-of-ordinary-people-facing-totalitarianism-73589
Origins of Totalitarianism pdf
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hannah-arendt-the-origins-of-totalitarianism.pdf
Maxim of law
Where the law gives a thing, it gives a remedy to recover.
Natural law
Is there a remedy to recover from present chaos, a world coup, transhumanism, depopulation, enslavement? Actually there is and for anyone interested, I will publish the remedy in an upcoming Blog. TY!
Addendum
Inference to Trump appears more timely than personal b/c the same inference would apply to every globalist ‘selected’ U.S. presidential candidate, who eventually takes the same unavoidable road to their party nomination — bar none.
1] Every serious candidate from both main political parties is compelled to sign a contract not to prosecute the war criminal U.S. presidents who served before them. This stipulation is both non-negotiable and binding throughout their term, should they be elected.
2] Every U.S. President is actually recruited for their ability to sell American warmongering the world over. This type of salesmanship is, BY FAR, the single most important trait that a presidential nominee can possess.
Fast forward: Transforming the war machine into a forced peace keeping machine is false peace. https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/is-the-end-of-forever-war-false-peace
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
australia-soulution
Inference to Trump appears more timely than personal b/c the same inference would apply to every globalist ‘selected’ U.S. presidential candidate, who eventually takes the same unavoidable road to their party nomination — bar none.
1] Every serious candidate from both main political parties is compelled to sign a contract not to prosecute the war criminal U.S. presidents who served before them. This stipulation is both non-negotiable and binding throughout their term, should they be elected.
2} Every U.S. President is actually recruited for their ability to sell American warmongering the world over. This type of salesmanship is, BY FAR, the single most important trait that a presidential nominee can possess.
Fast forward: Transforming the war machine into a forced peace keeping machine is false peace. https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/is-the-end-of-forever-war-false-peace
THE GREAT WORK!! You've touched on some crucial issues about the erosion of freedoms and the rise of authoritarian measures. The idea that natural law provides a remedy for injustices and chaos is indeed a profound one. In these times of increasing control and surveillance, it’s essential to remember that our voices and actions are powerful tools for change. The situation you’ve described, where speech is increasingly criminalized, highlights a troubling trend. Free speech is indeed a fundamental weapon against tyranny and a means to challenge and correct injustices. However, it's also important to recognize that while the legal and political landscapes are shifting, there are still avenues for advocacy and resistance. Engagement in grassroots movements, legal challenges, and international pressure can be effective in combating authoritarian measures. Collective action, informed discourse, and solidarity with like-minded individuals and organizations are vital. While the path may seem daunting, history shows that persistent and united efforts can lead to significant change. It's a challenging time, but as you’ve rightly pointed out, our voices and actions do matter. They are critical in shaping a future that aligns with our values and principles. Well substacked Doreen!! We THANK YOU, With Strength & Sovereignty, Peter & Teri _ AvaTara10