Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
Did you know this planet is under martial rule? By maxim of law, martial rule renders our laws silent. Hence there is no rule of law, no due process, no justice in the courts, no law enforcement for people of good conscience. The proof is crimes against humanity absent arrests, absent investigations, absent trials, absent prosecutions.
Doreen, I appreciate you reading my response and engaging. That is more than many people do. Thank you.
You say the planet is under martial rule, that laws are silent, that there is no justice, no due process, no law enforcement for people of good conscience. You point to crimes against humanity with no arrests, no investigations, no trials.
I understand why you feel this way. The world is on fire. Wars without end. Pandemics and cover-ups. Elites who seem untouchable. It is enough to make anyone believe the system is completely broken.
But here is where I gently disagree.
If the planet were truly under martial rule — if all laws were truly silent — you would not be able to post a comment on a Substack blog. I would not be able to reply. There would be no courts, no lawyers like Leighton Grey practicing openly, no Indigenous nations negotiating FPIC, no Prairie Key Act being drafted and shared.
The fact that we are having this conversation, in public, without fear of arrest, is proof that the rule of law has not entirely collapsed. It is damaged. It is corrupted. It is failing in many ways. But it is not silent.
You shared a link about military and intelligence coordination during COVID. I will read it. I have read many such dossiers. Some contain truths. Some contain distortions. The challenge is distinguishing between them. That is why we need courts, need trials, need investigations. Not because they work perfectly — they do not — but because the alternative is no accountability at all.
You say we must open our minds to new awareness about who we truly are and why we are here at this critical juncture. I agree. That is why I wrote the Prairie Key Act. Not because I trust the system. Because the system can be used. Laws can be drafted. Rights can be asserted. Provinces can act.
You believe the laws are silent. I believe they are merely sleeping. The Prairie Key Act is an alarm clock.
Read it. Then let us keep talking. The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
The Prairie Key Global Peace and Energy Freedom:
The Open Source Atom: How Saskatchewan Can Share Helium-Cooled Reactor Technology for Global Peace
A Multi-Part Series on Open-Source Nuclear, Shared Innovation, and the End of Energy Colonialism
Kudos to you for writing the Prairie Key Act. Thank you.
The full impact of martial rule, like every globalist agenda, is gradual, deceptive and subtle. “The enormous overreach of Bill C-22 and the unprecedented, open-ended powers it introduces are the latest in a series of legislative expansions of state power in recent legislation– bills that, individually and collectively, pose a dire threat to human rights in Canada.” https://cfe.torontomu.ca/blog/2026/04/feds-lawful-access-bill-c-22-unprecedented-assault-canadians-privacy-rights-and-must
Doreen, thank you for the kind words about the Prairie Key Act. I genuinely appreciate that you took the time to say that. Writing it was a lonely process, and knowing someone read it and found value means more than you know.
You raise Bill C-22 and the lawful access powers it grants. I have read the analysis you linked. It is concerning. The expansion of state surveillance powers — warrantless access to electronic communications, weakening of encryption, increased data retention — is a real threat to privacy rights. I do not dismiss this. I share your concern.
You also point to digital credit scores and biometric identification. The Ford patent for biometric vehicle identification is another piece of the puzzle. These technologies can be used for good — or for control. The difference is governance. The difference is accountability. The difference is whether citizens have a say.
Here is where I gently push back.
You see these developments as evidence of globalist martial rule — a coordinated, invisible hand tightening control over every aspect of life. I see them as discrete policy choices, made by identifiable actors, that can be opposed, rolled back, or redirected through democratic means.
Bill C-22 can be repealed. The next election is not that far away. The Ford patent does not become law unless regulators approve it. Digital credit scores can be regulated, restricted, or banned.
The Prairie Key Act is not a solution to every surveillance overreach. But it is a demonstration that the system can be used. One person wrote a 14-part legislative framework. That person is not a lawyer, not a politician, not a billionaire. That person is a retired Saskatchewan citizen with a keyboard and a conscience.
If I can do that, you can oppose Bill C-22. You can organize. You can run for office. You can support civil liberties organizations. You can vote.
The laws are not silent. They are contested. The question is whether you are in the fight.
I am. The Prairie Key Act is proof.
Read it. Then let us keep talking. The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
The Prairie Key Act and Indigenous Sovereignty: Why This Plan Is Different Article A Series on Why Indigenous Peoples Should Support the Prairie Key Global Peace Plan
22:49 mins Canada is a federation of sovereign states in Canada called provinces. Constitutionally, Canada does not have a national government. The Liberals, starting with Pierre Elliott Trudeau, started this campaign to regard themselves as a national government however there is no such thing. The only powers the federal government have are under Section 91 of the Constitution. Section 92 outlines everything under exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces. The Constitution is being inverted and perverted and what needs to happen is for the provinces to flex their muscle to enforce their jurisdiction. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html
It’s the provincial premiers you need to approach to claim your rights. Begin by demanding they invoke the ‘notwithstanding’ clause Section 33 and reject the carbon tax!
The federal government is constitutionally responsible for Indians. Wherever Indigenous groups are, the federal government is always there and b/c globalists are in control; they are the invisible hand and the federal government is the glove obscuring the true identity of who is behind UNDRIP. All that money will land on the backs of every Canadian and that money will be leaving Canada.
Canada is a huge, huge prize! When you take into account Canadian mines and minerals, oil and gas, water, trees, there is no greater prize than Canada and globalists know this.
Globalists want our resources.
Canadian military has been reduced to rubble. There is mass immigration, Chinese and globalists control everywhere. There are Chinese police stations in Canada, Chinese interference in national elections has been confirmed. The people must push back at the provincial level or wake up one morning without any rights or privileges. END
Kelly, the root cause of all suffering on this planet is separation. Earth, everything in, on, above, below and around Her belong to Infinite Intelligence, the Creator of All That Is, Was, Ever Shall Be.
Governments have been infiltrated. Politicians follow orders. Those orders are to advance one world governance, totalitarianism, a new world order at all cost.
UNDRIP is about ultimate ownership and control of all resources, all wealth and all human beings. May 2020 Rosa Koire [1956-2021] 5.16 mins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebiUd-Wb6NM
Doreen, you have posted the same comments repeatedly across multiple threads. I have read them. I have responded. You have not engaged with my responses. So I will make this brief and clear.
On the Constitution: You are correct that provinces have jurisdiction under Section 92. You are correct that the federal government has overstepped. The Prairie Key Act is a provincial law. It uses Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. Read it.
On UNDRIP: You claim UNDRIP is a globalist plot to control resources and people. That is false. I have read UNDRIP. It guarantees Indigenous peoples the right to self-determination, to their traditional lands, and to free, prior, and informed consent. These are human rights. Canada has violated them for centuries. UNDRIP is an attempt to correct that. If you oppose UNDRIP, you are opposing Indigenous rights. That is your choice. But do not dress it up as anti-globalism.
On Chinese police stations: The RCMP has investigated these claims. The so-called "police stations" are service centres for Chinese citizens abroad — passport renewal, notarization, document processing. There is no evidence of police powers exercised on Canadian soil. If you have evidence, present it. Vague claims are not evidence.
On separation: You say "the root cause of all suffering is separation." I agree. Separation from the Creator. Separation from each other. Separation from the land. That is why I oppose Alberta separation. That is why I wrote the Prairie Key Act — to keep the country together while giving provinces resource sovereignty. You are advocating for separation. You are advocating for more separation. Think about that.
On globalists: You see invisible hands everywhere. I see a different problem: real, identifiable corporate and political elites profiting from endless war. The Prairie Key Act names them. It conditions their access to resources. It redirects the peace dividend to healthcare and housing. That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a legislative framework. Read it.
You have not engaged with any of my substantive responses. You have reposted the same claims. Until you read the Prairie Key Act and address its actual provisions, there is nothing more to discuss.
I posted quotes from a 2023 interview with Leighton Grey; not my words.
Experience suggests UNDRIP guarantees Indigenous peoples the right to self-determination, to their traditional lands, and to free, prior, and informed consent … is as guaranteed as covid19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective. Human rights have been violated and eroded world-wide for millennia b/c humans consent to it.
I struggle to keep up with all the information coming at us. May I suggest you contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley with regards to Prairie Key Act?
Canada’s constitutional ‘correction’ to stop the reset - ignored.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
Doreen for some unknown reason my response to you doesn't seem to stay posted. So here is my response to your last post.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
Sorry, the app seems to be glitching. It isn't showing my replies to you as being posted so, I post again. I'll wait longer before reposting my replies a second or third time.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-a-legislative?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
Kelly, thank you. I appreciate your reply.
Did you know this planet is under martial rule? By maxim of law, martial rule renders our laws silent. Hence there is no rule of law, no due process, no justice in the courts, no law enforcement for people of good conscience. The proof is crimes against humanity absent arrests, absent investigations, absent trials, absent prosecutions.
A record of military and intelligence coordination of the global Covid event. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-covid-dossier-updated-a-record
It's up to each of us to open our minds to new awareness about who we truly are and why are here at this critical juncture.
Doreen, I appreciate you reading my response and engaging. That is more than many people do. Thank you.
You say the planet is under martial rule, that laws are silent, that there is no justice, no due process, no law enforcement for people of good conscience. You point to crimes against humanity with no arrests, no investigations, no trials.
I understand why you feel this way. The world is on fire. Wars without end. Pandemics and cover-ups. Elites who seem untouchable. It is enough to make anyone believe the system is completely broken.
But here is where I gently disagree.
If the planet were truly under martial rule — if all laws were truly silent — you would not be able to post a comment on a Substack blog. I would not be able to reply. There would be no courts, no lawyers like Leighton Grey practicing openly, no Indigenous nations negotiating FPIC, no Prairie Key Act being drafted and shared.
The fact that we are having this conversation, in public, without fear of arrest, is proof that the rule of law has not entirely collapsed. It is damaged. It is corrupted. It is failing in many ways. But it is not silent.
You shared a link about military and intelligence coordination during COVID. I will read it. I have read many such dossiers. Some contain truths. Some contain distortions. The challenge is distinguishing between them. That is why we need courts, need trials, need investigations. Not because they work perfectly — they do not — but because the alternative is no accountability at all.
You say we must open our minds to new awareness about who we truly are and why we are here at this critical juncture. I agree. That is why I wrote the Prairie Key Act. Not because I trust the system. Because the system can be used. Laws can be drafted. Rights can be asserted. Provinces can act.
You believe the laws are silent. I believe they are merely sleeping. The Prairie Key Act is an alarm clock.
Read it. Then let us keep talking. The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
The Prairie Key Global Peace and Energy Freedom:
The Open Source Atom: How Saskatchewan Can Share Helium-Cooled Reactor Technology for Global Peace
A Multi-Part Series on Open-Source Nuclear, Shared Innovation, and the End of Energy Colonialism
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-972?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-064?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-fb9?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-542?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-261?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-cc6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-edc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-62a?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-064?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/global-peace-and-energy-freedom-article-62a?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
Kudos to you for writing the Prairie Key Act. Thank you.
The full impact of martial rule, like every globalist agenda, is gradual, deceptive and subtle. “The enormous overreach of Bill C-22 and the unprecedented, open-ended powers it introduces are the latest in a series of legislative expansions of state power in recent legislation– bills that, individually and collectively, pose a dire threat to human rights in Canada.” https://cfe.torontomu.ca/blog/2026/04/feds-lawful-access-bill-c-22-unprecedented-assault-canadians-privacy-rights-and-must
Digital credit scores ... incoming world-wide.
USA https://substack.com/@francesleader/note/c-260585697
UK https://substack.com/@debarelli/note/c-260804650
USA Ford patent Biometric Identification https://substack.com/@anonymousmediagroup/note/c-249871848
Doreen, thank you for the kind words about the Prairie Key Act. I genuinely appreciate that you took the time to say that. Writing it was a lonely process, and knowing someone read it and found value means more than you know.
You raise Bill C-22 and the lawful access powers it grants. I have read the analysis you linked. It is concerning. The expansion of state surveillance powers — warrantless access to electronic communications, weakening of encryption, increased data retention — is a real threat to privacy rights. I do not dismiss this. I share your concern.
You also point to digital credit scores and biometric identification. The Ford patent for biometric vehicle identification is another piece of the puzzle. These technologies can be used for good — or for control. The difference is governance. The difference is accountability. The difference is whether citizens have a say.
Here is where I gently push back.
You see these developments as evidence of globalist martial rule — a coordinated, invisible hand tightening control over every aspect of life. I see them as discrete policy choices, made by identifiable actors, that can be opposed, rolled back, or redirected through democratic means.
Bill C-22 can be repealed. The next election is not that far away. The Ford patent does not become law unless regulators approve it. Digital credit scores can be regulated, restricted, or banned.
The Prairie Key Act is not a solution to every surveillance overreach. But it is a demonstration that the system can be used. One person wrote a 14-part legislative framework. That person is not a lawyer, not a politician, not a billionaire. That person is a retired Saskatchewan citizen with a keyboard and a conscience.
If I can do that, you can oppose Bill C-22. You can organize. You can run for office. You can support civil liberties organizations. You can vote.
The laws are not silent. They are contested. The question is whether you are in the fight.
I am. The Prairie Key Act is proof.
Read it. Then let us keep talking. The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
The Prairie Key Act and Indigenous Sovereignty: Why This Plan Is Different Article A Series on Why Indigenous Peoples Should Support the Prairie Key Global Peace Plan
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-c1c?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-bba?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-bf1?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-1d6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-081?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-d9f?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-and-indigenous-c80?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2
On June 30, 2023 Will Dove interviewed Indigenous lawyer Leighton Grey. Partial transcript below from this disabled link. https://ironwillreport.com/undrip-the-weaponization-of-indigenous-peoples-2/
22:49 mins Canada is a federation of sovereign states in Canada called provinces. Constitutionally, Canada does not have a national government. The Liberals, starting with Pierre Elliott Trudeau, started this campaign to regard themselves as a national government however there is no such thing. The only powers the federal government have are under Section 91 of the Constitution. Section 92 outlines everything under exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces. The Constitution is being inverted and perverted and what needs to happen is for the provinces to flex their muscle to enforce their jurisdiction. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html
It’s the provincial premiers you need to approach to claim your rights. Begin by demanding they invoke the ‘notwithstanding’ clause Section 33 and reject the carbon tax!
The federal government is constitutionally responsible for Indians. Wherever Indigenous groups are, the federal government is always there and b/c globalists are in control; they are the invisible hand and the federal government is the glove obscuring the true identity of who is behind UNDRIP. All that money will land on the backs of every Canadian and that money will be leaving Canada.
Canada is a huge, huge prize! When you take into account Canadian mines and minerals, oil and gas, water, trees, there is no greater prize than Canada and globalists know this.
Globalists want our resources.
Canadian military has been reduced to rubble. There is mass immigration, Chinese and globalists control everywhere. There are Chinese police stations in Canada, Chinese interference in national elections has been confirmed. The people must push back at the provincial level or wake up one morning without any rights or privileges. END
Kelly, the root cause of all suffering on this planet is separation. Earth, everything in, on, above, below and around Her belong to Infinite Intelligence, the Creator of All That Is, Was, Ever Shall Be.
Governments have been infiltrated. Politicians follow orders. Those orders are to advance one world governance, totalitarianism, a new world order at all cost.
UNDRIP is about ultimate ownership and control of all resources, all wealth and all human beings. May 2020 Rosa Koire [1956-2021] 5.16 mins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebiUd-Wb6NM
Doreen, you have posted the same comments repeatedly across multiple threads. I have read them. I have responded. You have not engaged with my responses. So I will make this brief and clear.
On the Constitution: You are correct that provinces have jurisdiction under Section 92. You are correct that the federal government has overstepped. The Prairie Key Act is a provincial law. It uses Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. Read it.
On UNDRIP: You claim UNDRIP is a globalist plot to control resources and people. That is false. I have read UNDRIP. It guarantees Indigenous peoples the right to self-determination, to their traditional lands, and to free, prior, and informed consent. These are human rights. Canada has violated them for centuries. UNDRIP is an attempt to correct that. If you oppose UNDRIP, you are opposing Indigenous rights. That is your choice. But do not dress it up as anti-globalism.
On Chinese police stations: The RCMP has investigated these claims. The so-called "police stations" are service centres for Chinese citizens abroad — passport renewal, notarization, document processing. There is no evidence of police powers exercised on Canadian soil. If you have evidence, present it. Vague claims are not evidence.
On separation: You say "the root cause of all suffering is separation." I agree. Separation from the Creator. Separation from each other. Separation from the land. That is why I oppose Alberta separation. That is why I wrote the Prairie Key Act — to keep the country together while giving provinces resource sovereignty. You are advocating for separation. You are advocating for more separation. Think about that.
On globalists: You see invisible hands everywhere. I see a different problem: real, identifiable corporate and political elites profiting from endless war. The Prairie Key Act names them. It conditions their access to resources. It redirects the peace dividend to healthcare and housing. That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a legislative framework. Read it.
You have not engaged with any of my substantive responses. You have reposted the same claims. Until you read the Prairie Key Act and address its actual provisions, there is nothing more to discuss.
The Act is ready. Read it. Then let us talk.
I posted quotes from a 2023 interview with Leighton Grey; not my words.
Experience suggests UNDRIP guarantees Indigenous peoples the right to self-determination, to their traditional lands, and to free, prior, and informed consent … is as guaranteed as covid19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective. Human rights have been violated and eroded world-wide for millennia b/c humans consent to it.
I struggle to keep up with all the information coming at us. May I suggest you contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley with regards to Prairie Key Act?
Canada’s constitutional ‘correction’ to stop the reset - ignored.
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/alert-canadas-constitutional-correction?s=w
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
Doreen for some unknown reason my response to you doesn't seem to stay posted. So here is my response to your last post.
Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.
You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.
But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.
You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.
You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.
You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.
Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.
The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.
I actually received your same message 3 x. I have to go offline now.
Sorry, the app seems to be glitching. It isn't showing my replies to you as being posted so, I post again. I'll wait longer before reposting my replies a second or third time.