Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kelly's avatar

Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.

You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.

But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.

You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.

You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.

You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.

Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.

The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.

Kelly's avatar

Doreen, thank you for clarifying that the Leighton Grey quotes were not your words. I understand you are sharing information, not necessarily endorsing every claim. I appreciate the distinction.

You say experience suggests UNDRIP's guarantees are "as guaranteed as COVID-19 experimental gene therapy was safe and effective." I understand your skepticism. Governments have broken promises. Human rights have been violated for millennia. You are not wrong to be wary.

But here is the difference. UNDRIP is not a vaccine. It is not a medical intervention. It is a declaration of rights — rights that Indigenous peoples have always had, regardless of what any government says. FPIC is not a government gift. It is a recognition of existing sovereignty. The Prairie Key Act does not rely on trust. It relies on law. Enforceable, justiciable, constitutional law.

You suggest I contact Leighton Grey and Shawn Buckley regarding the Prairie Key Act. That is a fair suggestion. I will. But I also invite you to read the Act yourself. It is published. It is free. It is not long. Read Part Thirteen — Indigenous Consent and Treaty Implementation. Read the FPIC provisions. Read the equity ownership requirements. Read the Treaty affirmation under Section 35.

You say Canada's constitutional "correction" to stop the reset is being ignored. The Prairie Key Act is that correction. It is provincial jurisdiction under Section 92. It does not wait for Ottawa. It does not ask permission. It acts.

You struggle to keep up with the information. I understand. There is so much. But the Prairie Key Act is not another conspiracy to track. It is a solution. A real, drafted, ready-to-introduce piece of legislation.

Read it. Then let us talk about what it actually says — not what Leighton Grey or Rosa Koire or anyone else says it says.

The Act is ready. Only courage is missing.

https://kellydwills55.substack.com/p/the-prairie-key-act-a-legislative?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r5v2

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?