U.S Government Will Never Get to Tell Doctors What They Can Say Anymore
Is the tide turning in our favour?
Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my human publications. Information presented is not intended to provide legal, lawful, financial or medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, nor prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only. I surround, protect, purify and make harmless the following information.
Free speech prevailed
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
Aug 06, 2026
What they can no longer do is punish us for telling our own patients the truth as we saw it: that in our medical judgment the state was coercing and mandating its citizens into receiving toxic, lethal, ineffective, illogical, and experimental gene therapies, and that we would not pretend otherwise. We continue to have the freedom, even in Clownifornia, to both hold and freely express opinions that contradict those of the priesthood within public health and academia. The court even said, in so many words, that the boards may not dress up a viewpoint prosecution as a “standard of care” or “informed consent” case. That was always the trick, and the judge saw through it.
Preliminary injunction
This is a preliminary injunction, which means the full fight over the merits continues. But a preliminary injunction is not a small thing because a federal court does not issue one unless it has concluded we are likely to win, and it protects us right now, today, from the machine that spent years trying to grind down doctors who would not read from the state’s script.
First Amendment
The sad reality of it all is that we had to learn that a government that can tell your doctor what he is allowed to say can basically tell your doctor to lie to you. The First Amendment exists for exactly this moment, when the official position is loud, certain, and literally dead wrong. It allows for what were a few handfuls of doctors to publicly warn you. That is, if you cared to listen to what they turned us into, i.e., “discredited doctors.” We were told to fall in line or lose everything. We said no (or, in my case, the emphatic New Yorker version of no). And a federal judge just told the State of California that saying no was our right (including the New Yorker version, although he didn’t state that specifically).
Free speech prevailed. We do not have to parrot pharma-government nonsense to keep our licenses. That principle was worth every day of this fight. Continues at https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/as-of-last-night-the-us-government
Technology
As cycles within cycles of time naturally came to a close during former world age shifts, internet and cell phones were not available to former civilizations. During this world age shift, technology allows this tract of man to share indisputable evidence of the truth to raise public awareness. Through caring enough to do so we raise our own frequency and the collective, which contribute to wiser and more informed decision making and strengthen preservation of our species.
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
courtcases