Vindication for Dr. William Bay as Supreme Court reinstates medical license!
Triumph over bureaucratic overreach.
Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
For those not following this story
The Liberty Beacon
Dec 15.24
AHPRA(Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) suspended Dr William Bay’s medical license for talking about the COVID vaccine harms. Supreme Court of Queensland just ruled that AHPRA did not afford Dr Bay procedural fairness… https://t.co/PzsMBBSPwI — aussie17 (@_aussie17) Dec 13, 2024
I shared a clip of Dr. William Bay from a few years ago when he boldly spoke out against experimental mRNA gene therapy, often mislabeled as “vaccines,” to a group of uncomfortable indoctrinated doctors at a medical conference. You can view the original clip in this thread (Point Number 8) or read the entire transcript to see how the pharmaceutical industry subtly “indoctrinates” doctors.
[LINK] — ER: Worth checking out!
Dr. Bay, known for his outspoken views on COVID-19 experimental vaccines, faced severe consequences, including a medical license suspension. However, the court found that the suspension decision was marred by bias and procedural unfairness. It’s a clear call to joy for the medical-truth community that has long advocated for transparency and fairness in healthcare regulations.
The comprehensive ruling by Justice Bradley not only reinstates Dr. Bay’s medical license but also holds AHPRA accountable for the legal costs incurred throughout the proceedings. Dr. Bay is now free to practice medicine once again, which includes the ability to prescribe treatments like Ivermectin, a pharma bashed controversial but crucial option in his toolkit.
The ruling declared that decisions made by AHPRA and the Board were invalid, thus freeing Dr. Bay from the unjust limitations placed on his medical practice. The court pointed out several flaws, including a lack of evidence supporting any claims of misconduct and a failure to provide Dr. Bay a fair chance to defend himself. This legal validation suggests that AHPRA and the Board might have acted more out of political motivation than genuine public safety concerns.
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
courtcase