Ct represents cycle thresholds or # of amplifications used in the PCR test. Ct up to 45 were used in PCR tests world-wide. There were no Ct standards established for labs nor hospitals, which allowed perpetrators to relentlessly report escalating cases to frighten unaware people into compliance with covid restrictions.
In an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct >25 as the virus is not detected in culture above this value [6]. This limit was then evoked in the French media during an interview with a member of the French Scientific Council Covid-19 as a possible value above which patients are no longer contagious [7]. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603
On the 04th February 2020 there was a teleconference held that was initiated by Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome trust) that discussed “desired outcomes”.
I requested information from the UK’s Government Office of Science, the department that Chief Science Officer Vallance is head of, on what these “desired outcomes” were.
The questions asked:
1 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available) with the subject “Teleconference”.
Please supply the e-mails in the e-mail chain and conversation with the subject line “Teleconference” or “Re:Teleconference".
2 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Anthony Fauci amongst others (full list of names available).
Please supply the written minutes of this telephone call, any written notes that were taken during this telephone call and any audio recordings that were taken during this telephone call.
3 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion and a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available). In one of these e-mails Jeremy Farrar stated:
Agenda
• Introduction, focus and desired outcomes - JF
What were the “desired outcomes” he was referring to as discussed in the teleconference call?”
Response
There answer was:
1 - the call did take place on the date stated
2 - there were no records taken of what was discussed
3 - They could not supply all the e-mails due to Section 41 of the Official Secrets Act due to personal information being included.
The quote:
“I confirm we do not hold the information you request in Question 2. No additional notes or minutes were recorded outside of the email correspondence provided in answer to Question 1. Nor do we hold any audio recordings of the conference call. “
This call was also admitted to in a FOI release of Fauci’s e-mails with no further information included. The file is 386 MB but can be downloaded here:
This is the call that initiated the use of PCR tests using a paper written by Drosten and that was accepted without challenge by Government’s worldwide and that then led on to restrictions on individuals and businesses based on that paper plus over £400 BILLION of Government spending in this country alone.
I have made the Public Accounts Committee aware of this call and they replied they were interested in it but whether they did anything further I don’t know.
Why was this call not thought important enough for notes to be taken?
After full disclosure by Paul Jackson Ph. D. to the premier and chief medical officer of Ontario, the government neglected their 'duty of care' by enforcing covid-19 restrictions without 'informed' consent. http://www.covidmakebelieve.com/index.php/2021/01/02/challenging-diagnostic-and-pcr-protocols-for-covid-19-in-ontario-canada/
Ct represents cycle thresholds or # of amplifications used in the PCR test. Ct up to 45 were used in PCR tests world-wide. There were no Ct standards established for labs nor hospitals, which allowed perpetrators to relentlessly report escalating cases to frighten unaware people into compliance with covid restrictions.
In an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct >25 as the virus is not detected in culture above this value [6]. This limit was then evoked in the French media during an interview with a member of the French Scientific Council Covid-19 as a possible value above which patients are no longer contagious [7]. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603
@Awkward Git: Thank you. See 'Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020' at https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/10-scientific-known-flaws-in-the
On the 04th February 2020 there was a teleconference held that was initiated by Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome trust) that discussed “desired outcomes”.
I requested information from the UK’s Government Office of Science, the department that Chief Science Officer Vallance is head of, on what these “desired outcomes” were.
The questions asked:
1 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available) with the subject “Teleconference”.
Please supply the e-mails in the e-mail chain and conversation with the subject line “Teleconference” or “Re:Teleconference".
2 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Anthony Fauci amongst others (full list of names available).
Please supply the written minutes of this telephone call, any written notes that were taken during this telephone call and any audio recordings that were taken during this telephone call.
3 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion and a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available). In one of these e-mails Jeremy Farrar stated:
Agenda
• Introduction, focus and desired outcomes - JF
What were the “desired outcomes” he was referring to as discussed in the teleconference call?”
Response
There answer was:
1 - the call did take place on the date stated
2 - there were no records taken of what was discussed
3 - They could not supply all the e-mails due to Section 41 of the Official Secrets Act due to personal information being included.
The quote:
“I confirm we do not hold the information you request in Question 2. No additional notes or minutes were recorded outside of the email correspondence provided in answer to Question 1. Nor do we hold any audio recordings of the conference call. “
This call was also admitted to in a FOI release of Fauci’s e-mails with no further information included. The file is 386 MB but can be downloaded here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561-leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails - page 3200 area.
This is the call that initiated the use of PCR tests using a paper written by Drosten and that was accepted without challenge by Government’s worldwide and that then led on to restrictions on individuals and businesses based on that paper plus over £400 BILLION of Government spending in this country alone.
I have made the Public Accounts Committee aware of this call and they replied they were interested in it but whether they did anything further I don’t know.
Why was this call not thought important enough for notes to be taken?
Something to hide by Vallance?