Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
Second half of video transcript not verbatim.
Isolation and Quarantine
By James Roguski
Apr 12.24
29:56 mins Most people have a basic understanding of the words ‘isolation’ and ’quarantine’. Definitions in the International Health Regulations [IHR] are backwards.
Isolation applies to people who are ill.
Quarantine applies to people who are suspect.
Suspect is literally a word defined in the IHR.
If you were on a cruise and someone on the cruise ship was sick or didn't pass a rapid antigen test or other such thing, maybe there was a package or powder and everybody walked through it and it was’ suspect’ as a contaminant, they could quarantine the entire vessel ‘as appropriate’. If you leave it open to ‘as appropriate’ they could lock down everything.
National sovereignty deception | warning to all travelers
31:47 mins Many people are arguing to protect national sovereignty. The trick is this. Making the ability for nations to quarantine foreign citizens who are traveling is actually an expression of national sovereignty. The United States Southern border is wide open and a lot of people are trying to lock that down. They would have people quarantined and jabbed to prevent dirty foreigners from coming across the border. You may believe that, until you're the dirty foreigner when you holiday away from home. In the United States there's a lot of press about Senate Bill 133 in Louisiana. It hasn’t yet been signed into law. It says the WHO does not have any jurisdiction in Louisiana, which is great except that is already the case.
Any state or national law that says the WHO doesn't have jurisdiction, is not going to help a traveler at the Paris airport where Macron’s government says use whatever decision you want to make ‘as appropriate’ to quarantine anybody who hasn't been jabbed, hasn't passed a test, hasn't done whatever it is French officials require. This trick has a lot of people standing up for national sovereignty when all of those things were put away February 2023 in the IHR final report. https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf
Nation states stand by big pharma
34:20 mins We need access to the current document so we can approach this with clarity. A year ago the US Ambassador Hamamoto agreed with the Chinese delegate; they wanted to keep secret what each nation had proposed. We finally get to see what each nation is asking for in the latest available versions, and it becomes very obvious at least for the United States, they're in support of big pharma. They don't want contracts to be transparent, they don't want liability to be upon pharmaceutical companies and they want to protect their profitability.
People are ignored
35:35 mins This whole time the entire premise of these negotiations is predicated on ignoring all the hard work so many people have been doing for the last three or four years.
Continuum of emergencies
36:38 mins Tedros Ghebreyesus, WHO Director General, already has unrestricted ability to declare a public health emergency of international concern. They want to add an early action alert. A fake doesn't have any criteria but they want to have a more easily declared early action alert [pre-fake?] without restrictions. They don't want to define a pandemic but they are trying to define a pandemic emergency. I call that post-fake. They want to have Tedros be able to declare a continuum of emergencies.
A lot of people now realize there was no pandemic. There was a lot of fear-mongering due to PCR. It was fraudulent use of the PCR process to scare people into thinking everybody walking around is sick and could be contagious, even though they're asymptomatic b/c the test says so. Allowing the Director General to utilize that authority to say there’s an emergency, an early action alert is needed here, and we've got this, that and the other thing going on all over the world, feeds into their business model of … if you're busy handing out contracts to distribute pandemic related products to the WHO’s global distribution and logistics network, you’ve got to move your product. How are you going to continue making money if you don't use products you put into storage?
New Gold Rush: find a pathogen with pandemic profit potential
39:11 mins They have a 20,000 square meter distribution hub in Dubai, one of the six regions. That’s four football fields. Can you imagine the corruption if the conference of the parties met annually to decide how to divvy up $30 billion? This is an organized crime syndicate, a cartel, to be able to look for pathogens with pandemic profiteering potential b/c this is the new Gold Rush.
You could drill for oil and gas, look for gold and diamonds but if you were able to identify the next scary genetic sequence and put that into the rumor mill in major media and the propaganda machine and have everybody believe in disease X, the boogeyman is just around the corner, take this drug or this jab or lock everything down or whatever it might be.
Smaller nations want inclusion
The smaller nations missed out on the profit that went to Pfizer, Moderna, and so forth. They’re arguing over intellectual property and manufacturing. They want investment from global North to go into developing nations to build genetic sequencing laboratories, testing, and manufacturing plants to make more mRNA jabs b/c they think we're going to fall for the ‘story’ that more of these biological/nanotech weapons are what the world needs.
If you have an outbreak of cholera, or water pollution problem, rather than spend billions of dollars getting clean water and healthy food and nutrition and generalized care, billions of dollars are being diverted into jabs and drugs for a mysterious pathogen with pandemic potential. This is the plan, to build out the market sector they find to be inordinately profitable.
Universal enabler
It would be up to the nations to make the actual decision in defense of national sovereignty, but in Annex 6 in the new documents the WHO wants to be the universal decider of which injectable they approve either pre-qualified or approved for emergency use. They charge a hefty fee to get listed as something that would be acceptable to use, and they want to harmonize it so if they say it's okay then it's okay for every other nation to say it's okay. It's not mandating it and this is where everybody gets a little confused. They're not forcing nations to do anything. The WHO is enabling nations to take the easy path.
Passing the buck
44:04 mins This amounts to … the WHO pre-qualified it for emergency use so our nation will require it. I exposed this two years ago when I found it was put into the Federal Register in the United States January 19, 2017. It was a final ruling by the CDC that made it so the only thing our Health Minister needed to declare a public health emergency, was to reference the fact that the Director General had declared a public health emergency of international concern. It’s not a mandate coming from the WHO. It is an enabling act in our regulations that gives our officials regulatory cover to do whatever they want. If Tedros said so, then Xavier Becerra can say so, your Governor, your health minister in your state, county, city can say so. It’s this cascade of passing the buck without any facts needed at the top of the pyramid, proposed by the Obama administration on the last full day of their term in office.
Legalized criminality
46:24 mins What we need to do now is the hard work of analyzing our emergency protocol legislation and how all the health care rules are governed. A lot of laws need to be repealed and new ones written in their place, to protect the people from corrupt legislation that has made it so that criminal activity is actually built into the law. That is a lot of work and we need to do it. It’s not going to be solved by saying the WHO needs to go away although, yes, it does.
Stop the negotiations
Over the last four years, local tyrants did not need any amendments to the IHR nor did they need a new pandemic treaty to abuse your rights and freedoms, so we need to act locally to bring that back under our control. The amendments in many ways are not what they were, and we still don't have a concrete answer about what they are. They meet April 22nd to the 26th which is supposed to be their final meeting to negotiate it. We need to stop it. They were supposed to be done in December and presented in January. They do not get to break their own rules and drop it on the table at the last minute. That’s not acceptable b/c it's intimately tied with the Treaty documents. The last meeting for that is April 22nd to Apr 26th. Two weeks following that April 29th to May 10th are meetings for the pandemic treaty. They were supposed to be done at the end of March but ran into a speed bump. They started with a 29 page document and got 5,000 text edits from various nations. It ballooned up to 110 page document. They're currently rewriting it. The new version is due to make the private rounds by the 18th of April and then they're meeting to have their final, final meeting April 29th to May 10th.
Biological/nanotech warfare
Why would we allow the WHO to be in charge of research development, seeking out, searching for pathogens with pandemic potential to bring into a pathogen access and benefit sharing system, to make money off pathogens that weren't necessarily bothering anybody, to put into their global distribution network to proliferate biological/nanotech weapons?
We already have the United States defense department doing that. The US pledged $5 billion to the pandemic fund and gave $340 million in 2023 to 37 different nations to build out laboratories and genetic sequencing and so forth. We have to understand this is biological/nanotech warfare. This is looking for a pathogen to scare people so they can profit from it, and if they're successful in convincing people to stick it in their arm we're talking an absolute Armageddon of disease, which feeds their business model.
Lethal business model
The business model is not to heal people or help them optimize and maintain their health, there's no money in that. These are all customer acquisition tools. If they can trick you with a test, if they can get you to take a poison they call a drug, if they can get you to inject a poison to prevent something you don't have but is right on the horizon, disease X is out there, be afraid, they're acquiring permanent lifetime customers.
If they kill you too quickly they don't make as much money and that's a problem. If you people would just understand that the business model does not benefit by helping you stay healthy. They benefit by helping you get and stay ill, and if you're currently healthy and they can convince you to do something that harms your health under the guise of preventing something you don't have, they've just acquired yet another long term customer.
This is not about your health
Don't be customers of the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex. Learn how to stay healthy. These negotiated Agreements are primarily an attempt to steal from poor people in rich nations in the global North by taxes or debt, to transfer that money to wealthy people in poor nations not to help the poor people but to help the profitability of those who want to be engaged in this business sector.
Envious WHO
I think the WHO is fund envy. They want a bigger, better, stronger fund so they can get into the profitable biological/nanotech weapons proliferation business.
John C: We know corruption is a big problem in the world. You have the role of Watchman, warning the people. You’ve done your duty thoroughly. The blood is not on your head, it's on people who choose to ignore the warnings.
James R: People across the world need to be aware of what it is they're doing, be clear and demand to see what is really going on. The simple answer is ‘no’ to the Amendments, ‘no’ to the Treaty b/c it's predicated on absolutely false assumptions. You can ask public officials “Was it the N or the O you were having difficulty understanding?
Feedback to Office of Global Affairs
In a recent listening session with our Office of Global Affairs people essentially said this is completely invalid, you missed your deadlines, you lied, you committed fraud in 2022, and even if you pretend to adopt something in May we're not having it. It's illegitimate, it will not be accepted, you will not line your pockets with our money to make products that harm people. It stops here.
Resources
Information from around the world at
https://exitthewho.org and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/archive?sort=community
Call me at 310-619-3055, text me, use Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp but most importantly share the daylights out of this video so people see the whole picture. Take out your phone, take out your camera, videotape any document you’ve read coming from the WHO so they cannot accuse you of misinformation. Take anything you want then express your opinion b/c if you're silent they will accept your silence as consent.
Part I https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/who-negotiations-must-be-stopped
Part II https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/who-negotiations-must-be-stopped-76d
Part III https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/who-negotiations-must-be-stopped-918
My RSVP to WHO negotiators
On behalf of every man, woman and child unaware of the truth, I asked the Working Group on Amendments to the IHR (2005), and U.S. delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body drafting and negotiating a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, to halt further negotiations until data provided in my RSVP is fully examined and factored into lessons learned, and before proceeding further. https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/my-response-to-ihr-amendments-and
Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
ihr